Bites: The 'F*** Off' watch - Elitist snobbery or scientific fact?

Good morning Crunchers,

This week I’m going to talk about the hidden wisdom of ArchiLuxury*, how research has shown that watches can make you smarter* and how I am basically Arnold Schwarzenegger*.

But check out all of this week’s fun stuff from WC first!

*exaggeration

Image

Three quick bites from WC this week for those in a rush…

@spencertheho tells us the story of a tool watch and the frustration of families: “A gift to my father in law gone wrong”

@Fieldwalker tells us where he’s been hiding for the past few days: “Back from desolation”

@Dariusll sparks a big discussion about watch budgets: “I can’t bring myself to consider paying more than 500 bucks for a watch”

Image

New members:

New members who I’ve seen posting this week… @Biggun1960, @GuidoM, @SD.cgi, @krokodilpolo, @Wristmgmt, @Doolish Welcome everyone!

Hot Posts:

This weeks topics that got the community talking…

“If you could buy your first watch all over again”@alexgee

“I am considering buying a moonswatch”@thomsen

“What do you enjoy most about this hobby?”@Juanluisgarcia

“The age old question: What should connect my dive watch to my wrist?”@Guvnor64

“Two watch enthusiasts”@Mr.Santana

“Post your vintage time pieces”@rar133

“Do you do it?”@educationalcandy

“What’s your grail?”@bunchahooey

Meetups and Events:

24th May – Meetup exploring British watch design with fears, Schofield and Studio-underd0g – London

1st June – Bremont Royal Exchange London Meetup – London

3rd June – So Cal meetup: free drinks, free-food and a special guest! – San Diego

10th June – London Brunch Meetup – London

12th June – The first 100 years of Patek Philippe – Online talk and meetup

20th June – Watch Meetup Solely for Ladies - London

14th – 16th July - Windup Watch Fair 2023 - Chicago

20th – 22nd October - Windup Watch Fair 2023 – New York

Image

Big thanks to @Porthole for setting last weeks photography theme of ‘Obsolescence’. His winner this week was @Stricko with this sad take on the watch industry….

Image

Come see the runners up and find out the chosen theme for this weeks photos here, which has been kindly set by this weeks guest judge @Ichibuns.

Image

My picks from this past weeks watch releases.

Image

Top row, left to right: Nodus (not new, but new to me thanks to @kudokun), Ollech and Wajs, The Lebond Siza,

Bottom row: Doxa, Goodwoof x Bamford GMT, The Minase 7 Windows, Marathon.

Image

Updates from the YouTubers, Podcasters and brandowners in our community.

“New color for the field watch protrail”@circula

“I’ve just received my second hour mandala burst: Video review”@HonestWatchReviews

“Run free my little friends”@GasWorks

“Andrew puts my collection out of its misery”@Max

“This G-shock is now discontinued”@MWC2020

Image

Longer posts from the knowledgeable and creative writers amongst the WC family….

“Watches in the Wild: Final push – Volume 36”@Edge168n

“Bi-metal watches: Not ick but slick”@Tr1stan

“A play with 3, 4, no… 5 actors”@Catskinner

“A trip down memory lane and meeting a childhood icon”@Stricko

Image

The 'F*** Off' watch: Elitist snobbery or basic truth?

The first time I came across the 'F*** Off' watch was when I was watching an ArchiLuxury video about a year or two ago.

I know! I know! But he was reviewing a watch I literally couldn't find another review on YouTube for!

So he talked about the fact that he and his wife liked to have one watch in their collections that was a FO watch. Now, at that time, knowing what kind of personality Archi was, I ignored it as some likely elitist drivel that he'd concocted himself.

I never heard the term again until it randomly cropped up in a video from a much more down-to-earth watch guy... Jody from JOMW.

He was reviewing a Rolex Explorer and referred to it as a FO and a F*** you watch.

So this got me thinking what on earth this actually meant.

In hindsight, googling 'f*** you watch' while at work was a very bad idea, and I will likely have I.T. come knock on my door in the next few days. It didn't even give me any answers, other than leading me back to ANOTHER ArchiLuxury video 'The Ultimate 10 FO Wrist Watches of All Time'.

The Ultimate 10 FO Wrist Watches of All Times

I know there will be people out there who can't quite stomach clicking the link and watching the video, so I will summarise...

Although Archi doesn't quite define what he means by a FO watch, he does give an anecdote about working in a company with a younger guy who would constantly flaunt and brag about his steel submariner, so he decided to go and ask him about it, pretend to be interested and then proceed to show him his solid gold Subby (what he describes as the ultimate FO watch).

Now... I know you're all probably out there reading this thinking...

Image

And there is also the fact that surely it would take two to tango with this anyway?

I mean, you would have to be a specific kind of person to actually feel impressed or intimidated by the watch someone is wearing.

Do you think this guy….

Image

...gives any kind of a toss about what this guy…

Image

...is trying to say with his watch?

In fact, would any of us?

Would we be intrigued, curious, keen to try some watch chat? Possibly.

Feeling intimidated or belittled by the thing? Nah.

So, do I just dismiss the whole concept as a game for the arrogant and insecure then?

Well, maybe not....

The idea of a FO watch can be a bit of an uncomfortable one for reasonable and decent folks, because it pangs of superiority. If your watch makes you better than other people, then by default it makes others inferior, and that's just not how we roll on WC.

Image

BUT maybe it can work if we reframe the FO watch as something that gives a signal to ourselves, rather than a signal to others.

In the past I've spoken about the 'fake it till you make it' guy, and how giving off the right kind of social signalling is important, but there is research to show that what we wear and the tools we use, actually impacts how well we perform in cognitive and physical tests.

These effects are called Enclothed Cognition and Positive Contagion.

With Enclothed Cognition, experiments found that people performed better in cognitive testing when wearing a lab coat that they were told belonged to a doctor, than when they were told the coat belonged to a painter. Interestingly, they had to be actually wearing the coat for it to work, just seeing it hanging on a chair during the testing didn't work.

The Positive Contagion theory is “the belief of transference of beneficial properties between animate persons/objects to previously neutral objects”. The research looked at golfers, and found that amateur players felt their shots were easier to take when they were told the putter they were using belonged to a champion golfer.

So, this explains why, when I wear my Seiko Arnie, I start to ask myself, “Perhaps I too can fight Aliens?”

Image

Honestly, this also isn't much different to sports players having lucky charms. It doesn't matter if it's real or not, it just matters that the player thinks it is.

So maybe a FO watch can simply be any watch that you wear which puts you in the frame of mind to tell the problems, barriers and negative vibes of the day to just FO, with the added benefit that you may actually perform better at work while wearing it too.

In a tangential thought... I wonder if the Enclothed Cognition effect could actually justify the ridiculous prices we pay for some watches?

Maybe a watch is actually worth the £500/£5000/£50,000 price tag if it is your own personal gauntlet of power?

Image

I also propose that this is why it doesn't matter if no one notices your watch. All that matters is that YOU know how freakin' awesome it is. That's where the power lies.

So... The FO/FU watch... (is there a difference??)

Is it a concept for the weak-minded?

Or useful psychological trickery?

Take care everyone.

Kaysia

Reply
·
Image

I like the Enclothed Cognition example as it means when I wear my bhf vest my heart is working at its best 😄

·

My commentary for @Stricko when I judged the photos, if anyone is interested…

“I laughed so hard at this, it’s brilliant. I like the photo, it’s vibrant, it’s playful, it has the brief nailed. I like the watch sprawled out over the grave like a wailing mourner, the zombie watch coming out of the ground (which for us vintage heads is pretty apt as to how some of our watches behave), and the Apple Watch lounging proud against the iPhone tombstone. Congratulations - have a biscuit!”

·
Porthole

My commentary for @Stricko when I judged the photos, if anyone is interested…

“I laughed so hard at this, it’s brilliant. I like the photo, it’s vibrant, it’s playful, it has the brief nailed. I like the watch sprawled out over the grave like a wailing mourner, the zombie watch coming out of the ground (which for us vintage heads is pretty apt as to how some of our watches behave), and the Apple Watch lounging proud against the iPhone tombstone. Congratulations - have a biscuit!”

Thank you!

I forgot to include the screenshot with your comment.

Is it just me that can't copy and paste from DMs? 🤷

·

Awesome as always Kaysia.

I'm a Brand Owner! My life is complete. I'm definitely getting those pens ordered. 🤣

Image

100% agree on the Emperor's new clothes theory. I think Paulo Nutini said it best when he said "I've got my new shoes on and everything's alright"

·

Never really thought of watches as 'F Off' tools, more just 'F my money'. I like the insight on how it takes 2 people who care too much for it to work that way!

·

Ever get dressed to the nines and feel that extra je ne sais quois?

No reason watches can't do the same. Or any object.

If it feels real to you, there's no doubt it can affect your attitude and confidence in a very real way.

·

Thanks for the mention! Sorry I'll be stepping away for a bit.

I hate the concept of an FU watch. Not because of snobbery (although that's also very distasteful) but because it borrows, poorly, from a much better idea, "FU Money."

I think what makes FU Money so attractive is the idea of independence, being able to call your own shots, and the ability to wake up in the morning and say "I can do whatever I want today."

It's not about peacocking or flaunting wealth. I have known many individuals who have less than me who nevertheless have achieved precisely what they need to be happy and feel wealthy and independent. I have known many visibly rich individuals with many multiples of my net worth who are, in turn, slaves to that wealth (mainly because the guy next door has a bigger house, nicer car, more extensive watch collection). One of those categories of people has FU Money. One doesn't.

An FU watch tries to borrow from that idea but does so in the same way that a kid's toy cellphone borrows from an actual smartphone. It's all form and no function. It's the inside stuff that matters not the outside.

An FU watch makes you look rich and independent. In fact, it does the exact opposite. Watches are cost centers and, by and large, they are not very good at attracting admiration from the sorts of people you want to be attracting admiration from. Maybe Archie understands that but somehow I doubt he's the type to reflect internally.

That doesn't mean I don't like often extremely pricey watches. I do very much and buy them occasionally. But I think it's important to know here they stand.

·

OMG I've won, many thanks to @Porthole for choosing my photo, I'm stoked,cannot take full credit for it, so many thanks to my daughter for the 5min lend of her phone (she had withdrawal symptoms) and the wifes umbrella (because very unlike the UK the sun was out).

Oh dear You've fell foul of IT, well you have a good excuse for it, a bit like Andy at my work whom i had been talking to about fishing on the local canal, so he typed in chesterfield canal, and forgot the C (and not chesterfield 😖) by the time we'd said "oh sugar" the managers phone was ringing🤣.

If something you wear makes you feel good it gives a PMA positive mental attitude, feeling good and positive helps you perform better. And as for sports n sports wear, if your not the elite/professional top of the game sports person does it really improve your performance using the best, no not really. But it makes you feel good, positive and in the mood, it's in reality not the gear but the idea, but the idea has come from the gear.

The idea of a FO watch can be positive, I look at my FO watches and they're not to make me superior over anyone else (because they definitely won't) but to give that personal positive vibe, maybe a bit shouty (sometimes not) give a boost and maybe just maybe get a bit more out of myself in whatever I'm doing. A FU watch can be belittling to others and just shows the the worst of the human psyche, mind you it can be quite nice to put a braggart down a peg or two. But it's got to be contextual, two big boys slugging it out,well you have your fun boys but picking on the little ones that's bullying.

Great piece as ever,so thanks from me. I'm off now to the pub to celebrate and wearing this month's FO watch 😆.

·

I LOVE stuff like Enclothed Cognitionand Positive Contagion!!!

But…

Image

You know, the entire Replication Crisis!!! Like, at this point, to a first approximation, ALL social science studies are just a) P-hacking, b) genuinely spurious results, c) publication bias, and / or d) outright fraud.

Hell, we thought it was confined to the social sciences, but then John Ioannidis has shown convincingly that medicine is afflicted with the same issue! And we’re coming to discover even something like physics is not safe either! The entire edifice of academic, peer-reviewed, publication-based scientific inquiry seems to be crumbling before us!

Nonetheless, yeah, personally, I do feel good when I wear my watches! Ha!

·

Makes sense as I feel a lot of pride and confidence when I strap on a watch I made or restored even though no one else notices it or cares or they wonder why I'm wearing that old thing on my wrist. However, for me it provides a bit of armor.

·

Oh man, many thoughts to share later on this topic. I had no idea @Fieldwalker posted something similar to my post last night. Required reading when I am done work.

·

Enjoyed the article. And agree about your watch giving you confidence, even if others have no clue. Just dressing sharp for work regardless of "uniform" does wonders. If you look like you mean business, in a small way your attitude will reflect this as well.

As far as "FO"-watches go, I own one that is a kind of like that, but more along the lines of IFYKYK/only wear if you've earned it.

Upon passing my Team Leader Certs and earning my master badge I purchased a dive watch with said badge lasered into the dial.

The watch itself is nothing crazy expensive, but typically it is taboo amongst EOD technicians to own personal items with the Master Badge (aka the crab) on them outside of unit issued shirts/hats/coins. So it's a flex, but very subtle and usually only amongst other techs.

·
Mr.Dee.Bater

I LOVE stuff like Enclothed Cognitionand Positive Contagion!!!

But…

Image

You know, the entire Replication Crisis!!! Like, at this point, to a first approximation, ALL social science studies are just a) P-hacking, b) genuinely spurious results, c) publication bias, and / or d) outright fraud.

Hell, we thought it was confined to the social sciences, but then John Ioannidis has shown convincingly that medicine is afflicted with the same issue! And we’re coming to discover even something like physics is not safe either! The entire edifice of academic, peer-reviewed, publication-based scientific inquiry seems to be crumbling before us!

Nonetheless, yeah, personally, I do feel good when I wear my watches! Ha!

Like everything else in the watch world...

Image

I promise to not go pitch the idea to Rolex to add it into their marketing.

However....

I do feel good when I wear my watches!

n = 1 observational study

.... I'm off to write my paper.

·

I'll be honest here. Reading the words "wisdom " and "ArchiLuxury" strung together in a single sentence tripped the alert of my oxymoron detector in a big way.

I can't stand ArchiLuxury internet persona and I would rather catch the pox than watch one of his videos. he is for me the personification of the used car salesman type that I avoid like the plague.

But then you are right because the transference that you described is also called totem magic, something which is practiced mostly by con artists nowadays.

·

I'm a little more new to the online watch scene but I never really understood the appeal of Archie video content or presentation style 🤔

·
hakki501

Congrats to @Stricko on your creative photo! 👍👍

Amazing article once again. 🎯 Haven't read the 64 preceding comments yet above, but the topic sure stirred some convos. Here's my two centavos worth of replies to your closing thought and questions...

1) "I also propose that this is why it doesn't matter if no one notices your watch. All that matters is that YOU know how freakin' awesome it is. That's where the power lies."

--> Exactly. In addition, I couldn't care less about ArchiLuxury's definition, explanation, and opinion. For me, watch collecting is not a measuring stick to determine who has the highest-reaching piss-- I am not competing with anyone. Nor is it a hierarchical scale to segregate peasantry from the elite-- we all deposit our stinky crap somewhere. What's more, at the end of the road, we will all be 6-feet under eventually. And, even if you asked to be buried with all your watches inside your coffin (or urn), as one famous rich guy mentioned recently, you won't be able to take it where you finally go.

So, I am the least intimidated by someone's $10M one-of-a-kind customized timepiece. I will always celebrate with him/her, but never feel inferior or FO-ed because my watch is a $100 timepiece. You do you, I do me. For me, the value of each piece in my collection is always assigned by me and me alone.

2) "So... The FO/FU watch... (is there a difference??) Is it a concept for the weak-minded? Or useful psychological trickery?

--> IMHO, it's definitely a concept of a weak puny mind, an insecure childish soul, a judgmental condescending heart, and a proud haughty spirit. It's a mindset that wreaks with discrimination, plain and simple. I am never tricked by such pitiful attitude or behavior.

IMHO, it's definitely a concept of a weak puny mind, an insecure childish soul, a judgmental condescending heart, and a proud haughty spirit. It's a mindset that wreaks with discrimination, plain and simple. I am never tricked by such pitiful attitude or behavior.

🎯

Bringing the wise words yet again Hakki.

·
Hueilin

There is an episode of Abbout Effing Time (forget which episode) on YouTube where Adrian Barker mentioned he got his, I think, Rolex Explorer as a FU watch. He became emotional after saying it to the other 2 hosts but never elaborated on the reason why.

How interesting!

I will have to hunt that episode out some time.

·
bradleypariah

My FOW can easily be interpreted as sour grapes, but hear me out. My grail watch isn't typical. It's the Bulova 2017 Grammy Precisionist. As you might know, Precisionists can be obtained for anywhere between $100 to $850. They're not "luxury" watches, but they're one of the most accurate watches in history, even nudging the likes of Casio digital watches out of the way.

I'm an audio nerd by trade, and the Grammy Precisionist has vinyl record grooves and a waveform on the dial. It's very "me."

Anyway, the other day, someone was talking to me about why luxury watches were worth it. I disagreed. I don't have anything against them, but despite being able to afford them, I don't think I ever will buy one because I'm too much of a pragmatic cheapskate. I look for dollar:performance ratio. This person's argument was that Rolex (and other high-dollar watches) have no equal because the second hand sweeps instead of ticks, and this somehow separates the men from the boys.

I grinned from ear to ear, shoved my watch in their face, and said, "You mean LIKE THIS??"

That was the one and only time I've ever used my watch to imply, "Oh, HUSH" to someone. I don't care if anyone else is impressed by my watch, I AM. I freakin' love the thing. The fact that my wife bought it for me for a birthday/anniversary gift is icing on the cake.

Image

That was the one and only time I've ever used my watch to imply, "Oh, HUSH" to someone.

Oh I bet that was a sweet sweet moment 😆 I 100% applaud you for taking the opportunity to take down a watch snob 👏

·

Similar to some comments, I think a FU/FO watch is no different than any sort of social signaling which is meant to demonstrate standing, status or competence. I don't think it's always meant to be dismissive, sometimes people are just proud and in many cases in a quiet, humble way.

Social studies and experiments are not absolute fact, sure, but they are thought provoking. You don't need a study to tell you a person's confidence in themselves is directly linked to their performance. Any number of objects or situations can affect this.

I think any watch or object can boost confidence the same way a new haircut or shoes can. Anyone that thinks they are impervious to these sorts of effects is kidding themselves. Even if you don't have a FO watch, there is something you do, or wear, or associate with in general that makes you feel like "you". If you lack this something, it lowers your confidence, if you augment it, opposite effect. There is a fine line between being confident and arrogant, but it still stems from the same thing, how you manage your ego. You either are more affected by your own criticisms or that of others, affected nonetheless.

I really believe only very few humans, in history, are so enlightened that they have grown beyond all objects or associations to the ego that they can truly walk around in bliss literally just existing and owning nothing. I am not one of them haha.

·
DeeperBlue

Yeah, your right, context and culture is important.

Around here (midlands UK) refering to something as 'FO' could just mean 'big'.

"I was just sitting there and this FO seagull came and stole my sausage roll!".

True story. 😆

That's a thing in Canada as well...

e.g. "I was about to go to sleep when a giant FO spider crawled out from under the bed"

·
nichtvondiesemjahrhundert

We're coming at this from very different places and values but I can see you're engaging in good faith which is really rare online and much appreciated.

I have no issue with dress codes and uniforms being associated with professionalism in certain occupations. The thing is that a uniform can be seen as professional and reliable but also as stuffy, stifling, hierarchical and bureaucratic. Sharp dressing is also no guarantee of professionalism - investment bankers and politicians are sharp dressers and trust in them is at an all-time low.

There are also plenty of counter examples of highly respected non-uniformed professions/occupations. Depends on the country, but from the ones that I've lived in teachers are a high status job in much of Europe unlike the US, all the regulated professions in the UK don't wear uniforms - law, accountancy, architecture and medicine where not having to wear a uniform is a mark of seniority for consultant physicians and surgeons, let alone the entire academic, creative, tech and marketing sectors.

More broadly there's been a dramatic decline in uniform-wearing and the social status of uniforms over the past 100 years. In the UK it's gone from the military being the pinnacle of social status to it often unfairly being viewed as the job done by people who can't get any other.

On your broader points about showing off, flexing and FU, these are all completely taboo in my culture - things we put great effort into raising our children not to do. So the idea of a professional qualification being a flex really highlighted how different and important cultural background can be. In my culture, my letters are a baseline guarantee to my clients of the quality of my work and to give them confidence in my integrity in serving them as I'm bound by the rules of professional conduct of my institution. In my culture retirement watches were seen as mark of respect to recognise loyal service and encourage the same in others, not an object for one to show off.

So each to his own I say! Uniforms and smartness can be great ways of communicating professionalism and inspiring people, but they're not the only way.

Agreed. And right back at you, open, honest, dialogue with a bedrock of respect needs to be more prevalent. It's the only way to learn.

I'd also argue there might not be an "official" uniform, but there is a framework of acceptability or expectations for presentation, regardless of job, social status, corporate, artistic, scientific, etc. It looks different to the outsider, but those in the field or community don't think of it as such.

Uniforms also change based on environ. For example, what is expected or req'd stateside, is vastly different overseas for some career fields in the military. And I'd again argue the same would be true of any other job. Since each region, country, etc would have its own micro-cosm of "standards" if you will.

And in regards to the professional flex, yes it definitly depends on the culture and background. Badges in particular hold special significance. If I see a crab displayed, I'm going to talk to that individual, not for stolen valor, but just to say hi and share our brotherhood/sisterhood, and that's across all nationalities. An EOD dude/chick has a tangible, instant connection to another fellow EOD, whoever/wherever they hail from.

Same can be said of anyone who has earned the right to display a trident, scroll, etc. (Seal, Ranger Regiment) So it's DEFINITELY a flex, but it's subtle.

·

FO/FU watch is either a stupidly expensive bling piece, or dirt cheap 'beater'

Basically it's something around the term sprezzatura, but in more provocative way. Like wearing cheap Casio with a 1000$ suit on a top executives meetings or wearing solid gold submariner (like Archie had) to your grandma's funeral. Something that is so out of place, that it actually works.

Something that says - I don't give a single f**k.

The watch version of a black turtleneck and dad sneakers on a tech CEO.

But for me - the ultimate FO or FU (it's the same thing really) is a 35mm quartz Royal Oak in solid gold.

Image

Angular brutalist toolish design, but there's nothing to this watch except just straightforward tasteless luxury. This watch don't have an outstanding movement to appreciate. Specs are basic to say the least, and no tool watch capabilities whatsoever. It's like a Kylie Jenner wearing Champion hoodie. Or Kanye wearing Dickies. Taking a tool item from blue-collar workers and shamelessly appropriating it. Taking industrial design and turning it into something that has almost zero practical sense, outside of telling you what time it is and how much disposable money you are ready to burn.

And then, suddenly it's 35mm. In an era when you see Kevin Heart wearing huge AP offshore it's just too small for a statement piece. Even more it's considered ladies watch by some and boy oh boy, you don't wanna be seen wearing anything even slightly 'ladies'. 'Why would anybody wear something except modern sports watch' - this was a comment on some watch related instagram page under the photo of a beautiful Cartier Tank Must. And yet, you are the one not playing those games. You are so above everybody else, that you are able to wear a mid-size watch as a statement piece. Because even tho it's quartz and it's 35mm it means that there's even less value for a huge money. And also, you are the one, who doesn't cover their insecurities with a huge pancake on a wrist. You are not afraid to show people who you are, and you don't need to look tough. You ARE tough. At some point in your life you just stopped caring. And so this is the watch that says FO/FU, I just don't care.

·
DeeperBlue

I love these stories. These older guys who have women who would not give them the time of day otherwise have no sense of self perception and think it is really about them and not a grift of some kind. These largely go unreported because many of the men are married and do not want to file charges.

·

If I had this watch it would be very hard for me to stay away from the Archie Luxury mindset of a FO watch.

Image
·
DeeperBlue

IMHO, it's definitely a concept of a weak puny mind, an insecure childish soul, a judgmental condescending heart, and a proud haughty spirit. It's a mindset that wreaks with discrimination, plain and simple. I am never tricked by such pitiful attitude or behavior.

🎯

Bringing the wise words yet again Hakki.

Just seconding your wise words yourself, mam, with my two cents worth... 😉

·

After reading the FO watch stuff, I sat back and was like it can't be that bad right?! Oh holy shit, that was rough to sit through, the music, the editing, the voice. Whewwww that took strength..

·
mainreasontostay

FO/FU watch is either a stupidly expensive bling piece, or dirt cheap 'beater'

Basically it's something around the term sprezzatura, but in more provocative way. Like wearing cheap Casio with a 1000$ suit on a top executives meetings or wearing solid gold submariner (like Archie had) to your grandma's funeral. Something that is so out of place, that it actually works.

Something that says - I don't give a single f**k.

The watch version of a black turtleneck and dad sneakers on a tech CEO.

But for me - the ultimate FO or FU (it's the same thing really) is a 35mm quartz Royal Oak in solid gold.

Image

Angular brutalist toolish design, but there's nothing to this watch except just straightforward tasteless luxury. This watch don't have an outstanding movement to appreciate. Specs are basic to say the least, and no tool watch capabilities whatsoever. It's like a Kylie Jenner wearing Champion hoodie. Or Kanye wearing Dickies. Taking a tool item from blue-collar workers and shamelessly appropriating it. Taking industrial design and turning it into something that has almost zero practical sense, outside of telling you what time it is and how much disposable money you are ready to burn.

And then, suddenly it's 35mm. In an era when you see Kevin Heart wearing huge AP offshore it's just too small for a statement piece. Even more it's considered ladies watch by some and boy oh boy, you don't wanna be seen wearing anything even slightly 'ladies'. 'Why would anybody wear something except modern sports watch' - this was a comment on some watch related instagram page under the photo of a beautiful Cartier Tank Must. And yet, you are the one not playing those games. You are so above everybody else, that you are able to wear a mid-size watch as a statement piece. Because even tho it's quartz and it's 35mm it means that there's even less value for a huge money. And also, you are the one, who doesn't cover their insecurities with a huge pancake on a wrist. You are not afraid to show people who you are, and you don't need to look tough. You ARE tough. At some point in your life you just stopped caring. And so this is the watch that says FO/FU, I just don't care.

Image

You nailed it 👌

·
In_awe

If I had this watch it would be very hard for me to stay away from the Archie Luxury mindset of a FO watch.

Image

Especially if you met Archi himself...

"Sure it's gold Archi! .... Here, have a close look at the lume pip....."

·

Thank you @Deeperblue for the feature!☺️Love the Hoff profile pic by the way!😄

Interesting article about placebo effect watches! Goes some way to explaining why I like movie watches so much!

·
DeeperBlue
Image

You nailed it 👌

thanks!

I just really like that small AP)))))