Need Feedback on this.

I have been looking at this Hamilton PSR Digital watch. It looks really cool to me and has a ton of history behind it but idk if I want to spend $600 plus on just a digital watch. I’m leaning towards getting it but just want to know what everyone thinks. Thanks!

Reply
·

I think it’s cool, but at that price it’s just a no go for me.

·

That would not be my first choice, but we all like what we like!

·

I absolutely love mine!

Image
·

$600 on a time only digital is a no from me... I just don't find it interesting enough for $600.

However, it's your finances & wrist. If you like it & can afford it, don't listen to us.

·

Just get one of these to scratch that retro itch and put the money you saved towards another watch:

Image
·

Nothing wrong on spending $600 on a watch, but have you considered how it fits in your collection and how many wears per week are you going to give it? How’s the cost per wear going to be?

·

I always think of it this way:

Do you like it more than $600?

Because few, if any, watch is worth the silly prices we pay for them, except we can afford it, we like them, and they're pretty.

Was my Jaeger LeCourtre worth $11,000? Nope, but I saved up for it, i liked it and it was pretty.

·

I wanted this watch since I saw Roger Moore wear it in Live and Let Die, however I couldn't justify paying that for a digital watch. I still needed to get it out of my system, so I wound up buying the Armitron Griffy which has the same look and vibe. It was enough for me to get it out of my system, for under $40

Image
·

If you like it and have the funds I say go for it. I like the vibe it gives off.

·
ImNevix

If you like it and have the funds I say go for it. I like the vibe it gives off.

Griffy baby!

Image
·

Don’t buy it.

Why? This thread is why. If you have ask, you should pass.

·

Doesn’t seem to be worth the $600. At least $500 of that is because hamilton’s name is on it. Just my honest opinion.

·
Image

I like mine!!!!

·

I really wanted the Matrix version but I tried it on in store and I didn’t get the I need this in my collection vibes. My advice is just try it on.

·

Looks very cool, gives off strong retro-futuristic vibes. Like many Hamiltons, it's also been in some movies, wasn't it?

I don't know much about it, but from the pictures it's build quality seems to be very high, when compared to some other digital watches like Casio or Armitron.

Have you tried it in person? I would definitely try a 600$ watch in person before buying it.

·
degenerateWA

It's a really fun watch. Old style with a current build. I see a lot of recommendations for the Armitron; they are not the same. I have both and the Armitron will not scratch that itch.

Don't get me wrong, I love the Armitron, but it's a stocking stuffer compared to the PSR

https://youtu.be/jp8cSi7aLx4?si=CMNhDVcLQ-wRlo9c

https://youtu.be/7McOif8dup8?si=jsbGt1xzmU8A4Zru

Great reviews, thanks! 👍

·

Have you considered an Armitron Griffy 1975? Same concept, same historical claim, and - to my tastes - a much better use of the display, all for less than 10% the cost of the Hamilton.

(Multiple case/color options, also!)

Image
·
degenerateWA

It's a really fun watch. Old style with a current build. I see a lot of recommendations for the Armitron; they are not the same. I have both and the Armitron will not scratch that itch.

Don't get me wrong, I love the Armitron, but it's a stocking stuffer compared to the PSR

https://youtu.be/jp8cSi7aLx4?si=CMNhDVcLQ-wRlo9c

https://youtu.be/7McOif8dup8?si=jsbGt1xzmU8A4Zru

In my case it satisfied the itch. I guess everyone is different in that regard. As my old friend Mick always said.

You can't always get what you want, but if you try real hard, you get what you need.

However, if you really wanted the PSR there really is no comparison between the two, I guess I'm easy to please.

·
TimexBadger

In my case it satisfied the itch. I guess everyone is different in that regard. As my old friend Mick always said.

You can't always get what you want, but if you try real hard, you get what you need.

However, if you really wanted the PSR there really is no comparison between the two, I guess I'm easy to please.

I think both watches are outstanding.

I agree that if you're dead set on the PSR specifically, the Griffy simply will not cut it. On the flipside, if you just want the visual appeal of an LED watch, then you can't get much better than the Griffy.

·
Crazy_Dana

You can get a REAL vintage LED for a lot less.

There are vintage LED watches from the 1970s still around, but many of them will be in iffy condition. I have some original Pulsar P2s & it was not easy finding them w/working electronics & a couple of them broke down & I had new modules put in (but keeping the cool old LED display). And, of course, there are issues w/short battery life, lack of water resistance, etc. I don't know enough about vintage LCD watches to have an opinion.

·
Mark.L

Spot on! Few people mentioned about the accuracy of this watch. I'm amazed by how accurate the watch is, sitting inside my collection. It is about 0.5 seconds time apart from smartphone.

in fact, I use it to 'gauge the real time' after re-sync my other mechanical watches everyday.

The class leading bracelet is also a point of consideration.

I feel that this piece is totally worth the price.

Like others say, buy what you like. If you don't feel it's worth the price, you can try those homage retro ones on the ebay.

Image

Forgot to mention that the super LCD & OLED screen is also another plus point.

Image
Image

I have the PSR & enjoy it (makes a great "stunt double" when it's too rainy or whatever to wear a P2), & it is accurate for a non-high accuracy (+/- 10 seconds/year) quartz. The bracelet is actually the thing I don't like about it. Like many modern bracelets, I think it's too heavy (for me, extra weight in things like solid links are just deadweight & don't = quality or luxury) & I'm not a fan of butterfly clasps. Fully understand how others like the bracelet, though.

·

Yeah an LED watch is very diff experience. Try it out first with a Armitron Griffy. I like my two tone version. I frankly think one of these type watches is enough to scratch that itch.

Image
·
drunkengmtmaster

There are vintage LED watches from the 1970s still around, but many of them will be in iffy condition. I have some original Pulsar P2s & it was not easy finding them w/working electronics & a couple of them broke down & I had new modules put in (but keeping the cool old LED display). And, of course, there are issues w/short battery life, lack of water resistance, etc. I don't know enough about vintage LCD watches to have an opinion.

Image

I have a 1974 Texas Instruments that works perfectly, but I can't get the back off and I resent having to bring it in. I need to break down sooner or later and do it. I miss the silly thing.

·

Definitely on my 'To Do' list. Maybe wee present to myself for Christmas.

·

Interested in the PSR as well! More pics from folks who own one - maybe wider angles?

·

Man, love the Hamilton but those Armitrons are 🤤 too!

·

I think that it’s incredibly cool and speaks perfectly to its place in history. It is possibly the most attractive watch of its type.

Of course, you have to be sure of it before you buy.

·

I find Hamilton watches are way over priced. Pretty basic and quite frankly dull in design. If it didnt have Hamilton stamped on it you probably wouldn't look at it twice.

·

Just DO IT! Likely my next watch as well. I had a Pulsar back in the 70s and want to remind myself just HOW COOL it was. 😉👍

·

Very Bond! Do It! It's a historic piece in its own unique way!