I am a tudor fan boy. To me tudor can do no wrong! But is it worth the almost 2 thousand dollar price difference from the Monta? Unfortunately I've never had the chance to hold a Monta but I've heard many positive things about it especially that bracelet. Which one would you guys choose?
Hello everyone I have been collecting watches for over 25 years now, I have way too many but I honestly love them all no matter what brand they are. I've recently left social media and now find myself...
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the authentic presence for this person or brand.
Tudor all day long for me.
I don't like snowflake hands or a date at 3 O'clock, but would still choose the Tudor. Because it's a Tudor. 🤔
I'm shallow like that.
Personally, I had not even heard of Monta, but I like Tudor more in appearance - but it is really expensive, if you want a budget solution, you have to make compromises, either in appearance or in quality. If I were you, I'd get a good Citizen or Seiko top model for good money instead of settling for something average.
I would go with the Tudor only because of the colour of the bezel numbers
I prefer the look of the Monta, also early Tudor GMT models had date QC issues
I would be looking down at my wrist reading Monta (whatever that is 🤣) thinking I wonder what the Tudor feels like again 🤔
Monta
Tudor
Tudor all day long I prefer the crown and the slight chamfer on the main body and the bracelet.
This is different depending on where you are from, as in the UK I can get used Tudors easily but for Monta I would need to buy new so the price difference isn't that much. A Monta ocean king would be around £2400 and a Pelagos is £2.5-3k so the choice is easy. However in the UK I can get CW easily and so the pelagos is about 5-6 times the price of a CW.
Tudor
Q:What's a Monta?
A:I dunno, what's the Monta with you?
Tudor for a true GMG Monta for a traveler’s GMT.
Sorry for Monta that should be caller's GMT.
Tudor
If I must pick one
Tudor!
Tudor....
The only correct answer
I like the Tudor a lot more, in all honesty
I’d say it depends on if you want a microbrand or not. A Monta will definitely not be as recognizable as a Tudor but the build quality is exceptional. But when you do meet someone that knows who Monta is it always turns into a great conversation. No wrong choice imo. 🍻
None cos of size. But the Monta if I had a gun to my head.
The monta looks cool plus I’ve already got the Tudor but the opaline dial one
Tudor is too thick. Monta (but I would get Longines or a used Omega Seamaster gmt)
I know Monta is a well respected and well made microbrand but when you blow past $2,000 in price, I think the real question is whether the Monta is worth more than the $1,000+ difference with other similar GMT microbrands and independents with similar movements (either the Sellita SW330 or ETA 2893-2 used in the Monta with custom rotor) and specs.
I am definitely not a movement snob and love buying microbrand and independent watches with Sellita, ETA, Seiko, Miyoya, etc. movements but the brand value makes a difference here (support network, in-house movement (for whatever that is worth but gives them an excuse to make it more costly), brand equity/history built over time, etc.).
Monta is an excellent microbrand. I like the opaline Tudor GMT best. Tudor is equal or better quality, better brand recognition, better movement, better resale, more likely to still be around in ten years…
I have the same dilemma between IWC Pilot Chrono and Laco Kiel 2. Still haven't decided...
If I must pick one
How is that even part of the conversation?
Echoing someone's answer above about GMT Master 2 being the only correct answer, I hate that Mercedes hand so passionately. So naturally I look at the Tudor dial and all I see is a kid's box full of different shape building cubes... It throws me off even more than the Merc hand. I wish some company came up with a piece that would look more normal.
Tudor all day... Except for maybe that sweet Longines Spirit Zulu Time with the green bezel in 39mm.