Which would you pick?

A modern Ceramic Daytona 116500ln or a vintage double red sea dweller? And why

Reply
·

daytona is striking

·

Obviously I’d have both!

In reality I will NEVER be able to afford either!!!

·

That Daytona is something else.

·

Daytona, Sea dweller I would feel like I had to protect it and not wear it as much

·

Double Red as not a fan of Chronographs. When all the Hands aren't pointing straight up towards 12 it annoys me 😠 so the functionality is redundant. And if you only need 3 hands to keep sane then the Daytona is nice but pointless.

·

Daytona. Don’t want the headaches that come with a vintage watch.

Image
·

DRSD! 🤔🤷🏽‍♂️🤓

·
DH_NYC

Daytona. Don’t want the headaches that come with a vintage watch.

Image

Agree

·

Daytona, but 126500.

·

That Sea Dweller is absolutely stunning. Easy choice for me.

·

The Daytona for sure. Looks awesome and you don’t need to baby it. That black variant is my favorite.

·
Subshark

Daytona, but 126500.

Agree

·

Seadweller

·

They are different! You should but both.

·

Buy both.

·

Modern

·

Neither. I would pick an Omega.

·

Sea Dweller. The Daytona’s “magic” is lost on me.

·

Sea dweller.

Would rather have a robust diver...chronos are neat but it's a complication I just do not use.

·

Double Red Sea Dweller. I have a Great White "rail dial", maybe someday will upgrade to a DR (but would need to be a good one). Why - I am not a chronograph guy, can appreciate them, but fundamental prefer three hands (maybe a fourth for a GMT function). Also generally if you ask me 1) a super cool vintage classic or 2) a super cool modern classic, I will choose the former.

Image
·

Daytona could be a classic in the making or not, the vintage is surely watches for the conversation.

·

Newer models usually for me, Daytona would be all weather and all scenarios for years.

·

Daytona 💯

·

Double Red, every day.

·

That Sea Dweller looks proper cool. The Daytona is bling to me - I've just never warmed to it.

Daytona all day everyday🖤🩶