I've seen a couple of people say this now, and I don't quite understand how a watch you personally don't enjoy would ruin the one you do enjoy in the same line? Isn't it just more choice, and it doesn't change your watch in any way?

I personally think it's kinda cool, although priced too high.

The prices Tudor (and any brand for that matter) sets are suggested retail prices. In theory, an AD can ask any price they want, but they will of course just follow the suggested price. So if Tudor increases its suggested price AD's will follow, doesn't matter if it was already acquired stock or not.

I've never seen one in person so maybe I should go to the Patek museum.

That Altair is stunning. I really enjoy Arbib's work as well, the radical designs like the T-403 Tin-o-Matic are incredible. You've got 3 beautiful pieces there!

Fun to see all the watches people choose, the VC 222 looks like a really popular one.

For me it would have to be the Patek Philippe 3424 by Gilbert Albert

I think they did a great job. Positioning themselves as an upgrade to the Tissot PRX has been a great strategy, and with the now smaller version following they have cemented that. One of the co-founders said in an interview that this along with the Bel Canto has propelled CW to new heights, which is great to hear, and I think they have a bright future ahead.

I did hear some complaining online about the ±20s accuracy for a €1000+ watch, so I'm curious what other people think of that. All in all it's not my style, but it'll sell very well, I have no doubts about that.

Yet again a very nice read, an excellent choice. Longines indeed strikes a great balance between vintage and modern, and I think their Heritage collection reflects that perfectly. The Bigeye is definitely a stand-out piece, in a very good way.

I feel like it’s more a certificate of craftsmanship than anything else. For me personally the chronometer rating is not necessary but accuracy to some degree is needed.