Should you buy a chronometer?

I have multiple watches and am starting to wonder whether chronometers are a waste of money. I always seem to have to reset them when I wear them.

60 votes ·
Reply
·

I feel like it’s more a certificate of craftsmanship than anything else. For me personally the chronometer rating is not necessary but accuracy to some degree is needed.

·

Chronometer certification is a nice to have and shows the craftsmanship more than anything else.

In this day and age, super accuracy, along with long power reserve, is nice to have but not a must as we have many other means to tell and correct the time on our watches.

That said, I still expect a watch to keep time (+/- a min or two a day is fine - I’ve low standards) when I’m wearing it.

·

If you want accuracy buy quartz

·

I wouldn't really buy a mechanical watch based on whether it had a chronometer grade movement or not. If you don't like having to reset you may be better off with a high accuracy quartz like a grand Seiko or one that syncs to the atomic clock

·

I went full METAS Master Chronometer. 😂😂

Do I NEED it? Of course not!

But it's my Grail & was in the fortunate position that I could get it so I did. 👏🏻

Wanted it because it blows my mind that such a tiny machine that's moving about all day can be so accurate . 🤯

I'd never be able to buy a private jet, yacht or mansion but I could get what in my eyes is the ultimate mechanical watch.

I voted A, not NEED but WANT because it's possible 😉

·

D) No

·

I almost never spend my money on a watch that isn’t accuracy certified to COSC standards.

Quartz is okay. JLC, Cartier, and Rolex certification is also acceptable.

·

I rarely wear the same watch consecutively for more than a couple of days so I'm completely fine with it losing 15 seconds to 1 minute by the time I put it back in the watch box.

Even if it was METAS certified, it would still run out of juice in the watch box and I would have to set the time again the next time I pick it up.

Sure, accuracy is nice. But it's not worth several thousands of euros for me.

·
Beanna

I rarely wear the same watch consecutively for more than a couple of days so I'm completely fine with it losing 15 seconds to 1 minute by the time I put it back in the watch box.

Even if it was METAS certified, it would still run out of juice in the watch box and I would have to set the time again the next time I pick it up.

Sure, accuracy is nice. But it's not worth several thousands of euros for me.

That’s exactly what I’m thinking

·

Depends. In my primary collection, typically yes. Anything above $4k really ought to be chronometer or METAS certified. On the other hand, in my budget sub collection I’m much more lax. A Pagani with a Seiko movement that cost me under a hundred bucks owes me nothing more than it’s rated for.