I have a long list of dislikes that I have identified over the last decade of collecting. Among those are a few absolute deal breakers. The rest, well it is rare that a watch have these attributes and I wind up keeping it.
My list of dislikes:
>40mm width
13mm height
>48mm L2L
Flat case shape/lugs
Case side engraving
NATOS
Butterfly clasps
PVD/DLC coatings
Outer AR coating
No AR coating
Lack of quick change date on date models
Ghost date dials
Incomplete Arabic numerals
Roman numerals
California dials
Mixed Roman and stick indices
small crowns
large crown guards
Folded link bracelets
No micro adjustments
Bubble case backs
Straight end link bracelets
Mercedes hands
Mercedes hands
Folded link bracelets
Absolute deal breakers for me
The only true deal breaker for me is size or complete lack of adjustability. If it's too big, or can't be made to fit, then I just can't wear it. Of course I have other preferences, but just about anything else can be worked with under the right circumstances.
I can make them so anything over $200.00 is a deal breaker.
Less than 100m of water resistance, and untill my kids are out of the break everything they can phase anything over 1000€ is out for me.
Probably integrated bracelets. I do keep a few watches on bracelets. But my general preference for quick change straps to have multiple options on a watch. Also, odd size lug widths. Obvious ploy to try to get customers to buy replacement straps through the brand, always overpriced.
Another vote for integrated straps/bracelets.
If I can't swap them out with reckless abandon the watch is dead to me.
Also overlapping subdials/scales that partially obscure other subdials/scales. I invite whoever came up with that idea,lo, so many decades ago,or his descendants, to pound sand.
And don't even get me started on pins and collars.
Another vote for integrated straps/bracelets.
If I can't swap them out with reckless abandon the watch is dead to me.
Also overlapping subdials/scales that partially obscure other subdials/scales. I invite whoever came up with that idea,lo, so many decades ago,or his descendants, to pound sand.
And don't even get me started on pins and collars.
Pins and collar systems aren't a deal breaker but they sure as hell piss me off. Still remember my first encounter with them, Seiko Monster orange dial. Unparalleled cursing fit for over an hour.
Faux rivets on Tudor black bay bracelets.
That's it!
And yet another vote for integrated bracelets.
Nothing, fashion-wise, should ever have been allowed to escape from the 1970’s. 😊
Mercedes hands
Snowflake hands
Bracelets (integrated or not)
Chronographs or superfluous subdials (the dials always look too crowded for me)
Too big (>42) or too small (<38)
Gold and steel cases
Massive bezels on dive watches
Maybe sunburst dials, not totally sure about this one
Oh and also skeleton dials, not a massive fan either.
I've reached a point where I have the watches I need/want, so now I can be very picky.
My deal breakers in no particular order:
Non-sapphire crystals
No date/Poorly integrated date(has to match the aesthetic of the watch)
>42mm
>13mm thick
Roman numerals
Integrated bracelets
Seiko NH3X/Miyota 8000 series movements
Mercedes hands
Patterned/textured dials(looking at you Seiko/GS)
I'm sure there are a few more, but these are the ones at the forefront of my mind.
Size for me.
Price 😂
Personally (wrist just under 6’ in)
Case diameter >42mm
Case thickness >13mm
No sapphire crystal
Don’t mind quartz without the automatic movement, but wouldn’t spend over $150 for one.
I like Seiko’s as well, but can’t justify spending over $200 without a sapphire crystal
PVD/dlc coating or whatever coating used to darken SS
Even worse; SS crown/pushers made black on ceramic case watches
pricey quartz movements
Dealbreaker for me is if it’s bigger than 40mm in diameter (with exception, G-Shock is still ok). I have a 6.5” wrist so larger than 40mm looks bad. I can’t grow my wrist (sadly) so that’s a dealbreaker!
Unreadable dials are starting to get on my nerves. I can deal with just about everything else. I want to be able to look at my watch and instantly see what time it is. I have a skeletonized watch that was given to me and I keep it because it was from my daughter. Aesthetically I like the idea but practically, I can't use it, I just have a hard time reading the time.
Low bar water resistants
Cyclops/candy bar magnifier
No lume.
Lug to lug exceeding 49 mm, ideal diameter sweet spot 36-40 but I'll go up to 44mm. Not counting chunky Casio's of course.
Price over a few hundred starts to get silly for a guy like me.
It's gotta be a dad watch in some way as well 😜.
AM / PM indicator.
watch thickness, 12mm seems to be my limit
lug to lug too long
case size 40mm - 36mm is my range
I prefer bracelet however I have made a few exceptions
I don't know much about movements but some are too noisy
I really don't like boxed crystal just adds unnecessary height
not a huge fan of high polished cases
For me it’s the too much literature on the dial like who needs to know “26 Jewels,” “Sapphire,” “Diashock” and etc. Why not put that on the caseback? Also watches that are too large 43mm and up for daily use unless they have an actual purpose like large pilot’s watches or a big diver.
What keeps me from buying a watch? Usually price, but my primary deal breakers are no hacking and a power indicator.
Too big case size!
90 click bezel 💩
90 click bezel 💩
Oh, why would anyone even think that is ok?! 60 or 120. Even 30 would be preferable to 90. Maybe 240 should be the new normal?
The biggest deal breaker for me is a 10 O'clock crown. I wear watches below the wrist bone and the angle of those crowns dig thru the skin on my wrist-knuckle.
My go to size is 39mm so I don’t want to go far from that if it’s 41mm or more than I just keep looking.
Roman numerals
Bad lume