There’s a watchmaker in Germany who specializes in servicing Soviet era watches: https://www.poljot24.de/en/
On the one hand, you’re completely correct. These watches shouldn’t be compared to one another.
On the other hand, feature by feature, these watches are functionally equivalent to each other. A moon phase complication is a moon phase complication.
The greater question here is what are the non-equivalent factors that cause one watch to be so much more expensive than the other.
I appreciate, respect, and own Swiss mechanical watches. I can justify to myself spending between $1,500 to $15,000 for an excellent watch from Omega, Tudor, or Rolex.
But $150,000 for a Swiss watch? There are other factors at play here beyond quality and precious metals.
Why is the brand of Patek Philippe worth 5,000X+ more than the Casio for a functionally equivalent watch?
It’s clearly worth more, but that much more?
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/07/fashion/watch-name-inspiration.html?unlocked_article_code=1._Ew.mgY-.8_ED845QhCk4&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringS...
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the authentic presence for this person or brand.