I often look at my collection (all sub $500) and think, "If I didn't buy these 4 or 5 watches (or if i sell these 4 or 5 watches), I could have a ________. " But than I wonder if I would be happier with 2 or 3 expensive watches vs 10 or 12 cheaper watches. And I don't think I would be. Everyone's experience and preference is different, but for me, part of the fun is having choices (as long as they all get worn). I admire folks who can own 2 or 3 higher end watches and be happy, but I know that will never be me. Maybe it is for you, though.
Having goals and "grail watches" is a big part of collecting, however, I would recommend not dwelling too much on your "grail watch" as it will make everything else seem not good enough, and will rob you of the joy of owning some really great watches that you can afford right now.
Of course, that's just my opinion, for whatever it's worth....
Each model is different. I took mine in because it stopped completely (I hadn't worn it in a while) and I thought something was wrong. They looked up the model and said it took 180hrs for full charge. I put it out in the sun for a couple days and it started working properly. Mine is a perpetual atomic model, so it might be higher than most.
Thanks for all the responses! Looks like Uncle Seiko is the clear winner. I had a feeling that would be the case. I guess I just wanted some confirmation before pulling the trigger.
Vanoost hasn't earned any badges, yet.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the authentic presence for this person or brand.