At first glance without looking at the branding I would say the Seiko is the better looking of the two. No doubt the fininshing on the Rolex will be far superior but, there's some very subtle visual differences in shape (and the lack of polishing) that gives the Seiko the win.
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in ourย Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
One leaves a mighty hole the bank account
Seiko subdials are block black
One leg is both the same.
The Seiko offers a compelling value, is quite different in aesthetic details even if both are pandas, and most importantly it is available!
One looks like a panda, the other looks surprised
At first glance without looking at the branding I would say the Seiko is the better looking of the two. No doubt the fininshing on the Rolex will be far superior but, there's some very subtle visual differences in shape (and the lack of polishing) that gives the Seiko the win.
The darker indices and dark outlines of the hands make the Seiko more legible.
The one on the right has usable pushers
One is a seiko and one is a Rolex ๐
One has power reserve and accuracy measured in monthsโฆ.while the other has acquisition time measured in months (?years?)
Yes, over US$30K difference๐
Yeah, one you can buy at an AD and the other you can't (nor would I want to) unless you spend >$30,000K on stuff for your wife...