A Review of the Yacht-Master 40: An under-valued gem?

So my first contribution to this forum is going to be in the form of a review of my recently purchased Rolex Yacht-Master 40, ref: 126655. I understand that this watch is not for everyone but if anyone is out there looking for a super wearable everyday watch with that touch of flair and style, then please read on because trust me, you will be delighted with this time piece. It might be quite long so please skip along to whichever part you're interested in!

Some context first, without boring anyone, Im in my late-thirties, single af, unemployed (recently got laid off from my job), and this combined with rampant inflation, soaring interest rates, and rapidly depreciating currency, I decided that NOW was the opportune moment to purchase a luxury watch, and not just any luxury watch, but a gold one. YOLO and all that.

Material: Right, onto the watch. Firstly this watch is made of "ever-rose" gold. For those who may not be aware, this "patented" special alloy of 18ct gold was introduced in 2005, by Rolex with the objective of preserving the beauty of its pink gold watches. The amazing thing here, is that its cast in Rolex's own foundry, how cool is that. Rolex is often misunderstood but you cannot deny that they take their materials seriously.

Bracelet: The watch features an "oyster-flex" BRACELET, and I say bracelet because this is also often misunderstood by some enthusiasts. The Oysterflex bracelet basically consists of a thin, flexible metal blade that is made of titanium inside a moulded elastomer outer coating. So right there, lets put the "I can't believe Rolex uses a cheap rubber strap on its gold watches" argument to bed. But Rolex being Rolex, it has another cool trick up its sleeve, which is the so-called "comfort pad" moulded into the under-side of the strap. This seemingly insignificant feature is actually from a U.S. Patent filed by Rolex in 2015, which goes on to describe "Document JP2002262910 proposes to produce a transverse opening in the thickness of the bracelet strand around the zone where the bracelet strand is fastened to the watchcase, to result in a damping of the stresses exerted by the bracelet on the wearer's arm." So what does this all mean? It means that the watch is extremely comfortable. Oh I forgot to mention, yes it includes another patent, the Rolex Glidelock clasp to really dial in that fit with 2.5mm increments. All this secured with screws and the whole fit and finish just feels absolutely solid. The process to size the strap when you purchase the watch is also fairly unique to Rolex. Essentially they measure your wrist using Rolex's "Official" measuring tape, then the rep will look at the chart below and determine which length you need. So, NO the strap is not CUT or anything, as you can see there are multitude of combinations ranging for C to H and you choose the combo to fit your wrist size. I love how Rolex has gone the extra mile to actually produce, and prepare every length so you're walking out the AD with the right fit and not having to back order etc. It is for sure not the most cost-effective solution but absolutely the best one for the consumer in my opinion.

Image

Bravo Rolex, 10/10 for comfort.

Image
Image
Image

Movement: This watch houses the Rolex Caliber 3235, introduced I believe in 2015 and is the new generation movement to replace the 31XX series. According to the website the movement has an ample 70-hour power reserve, 14 patents, 90 percent new components and a performance increase of 15 percent over the previous gen. One of the most touted innovations in this caliber is the so called Chronergy escapement, a modern take on the Swiss lever variation. The escape wheel is pierced, which makes it lighter, and this in turn reduces inertia and thereby also improving power transfer. The escape wheel and pallet fork are made of nickel-phosphorus (LIGA) to avoid interference by magnetism. Otherwise, the 3235 retains the Parachrom balance spring and Paraflex shock absorbers. Oh and it is guaranteed to perform better than COSC specs, so thats good enough for me, and probably for you too. The only criticism I can throw at this is the fact that all this is behind a solid case back and I would have loved a transparent case back.

Design: So now we come onto the design. This is where it becomes highly subjective so this will just purely be my own opinion. What I really love with this particular model is the "matte" ceramic bezel with polished numerals, against a matte dial. I tend to think of watches and fashion in general as a "slide rule", where one end is Formal and the other is Casual. I feel like the YM40 really manages to tread that balance so well, by using a "flashier" metal like Ever-rose BUT toning that down with a black matte bezel and matte dial. Just when its getting TOO under the radar, Rolex uses polished applied indices to make the dial pop. The whole package just works brilliantly with a variety of styles.

Image
Image

Value: And finally we come to the question of value. I purchased this watch recently from my go-to AD here in Tokyo, Japan for a retail price of 3,429,800 JPY, which comes to around $24,500.00 USD as of July 29 exchange rates. I understand of course, this is an "expensive" watch but to be honest, any watch over $500 is in my eyes, "expensive" and probably unnecessary so Im coming from a "relative" value perspective, and in that sense, I find this watch to be of great value. Lets briefly look at some alternative watches you could possibly get at this sort of price range in gold. We have watches like the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M which I would say is fairly comparable to the YM40, though it boasts some additional water resistance, but its priced at 4,114,000 JPY, thats nearly $30,000.00 so $5,000 more than the Rolex, which honestly surprised me. Alternatively for similar money you can get a brand new JLC Reverso Tribute for 3,322,000 JPY if you prefer that style, but that one lacks any water resistance and arguably has far less gold in it as well. Incidentally you can also get a Patek Philippe 5167A-001 for 3,267,000 JPY but of course this one is in steel. The pricing of the YM40 on chrono24 is circa $28,000.00 which to be fair isn't a massive premium on the retail price either.

Conclusion: All in all, I find this watch to be a fantastic "all-rounder" a Luxury GADA watch shall we say. Whatever you throw at it, it will handle and it can go from gardening, swimming, to more formal dinner/drinks occasions in a nice bar. Its also mentally not as stressful because you know you are not wearing a watch that has an opportunity cost of 2X MSRP like many other Sport Rolex or SS Pateks etc. It is for me a positive that the watch is somewhat overlooked and not considered highly "collectible" which allows me to wear it with ease as well.

Im going to post a couple of wrist shots but please note I was not blessed with great "wrist shot" wrists, and so the watch may appear big on me, my wrists are a meagre 15.5cm or thereabouts, so just around 6 inches on a hot day. And now that I'm unemployed, having just spent my food money on a watch, Ive also lost weight 😂 Priorities.

Image
Image
Image

Thank you for reading it and if you have any questions/comments, please express them :)

A Review of the Yacht-Master 40: An under-valued gem?

4.0
Yes No
5/5
3/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
  • The matte ceramic black bezel and matte dial.
  • The proprietary Rolex Ever-rose gold is stunning and resilient.
  • Supremely comfortable, my most comfortable watch I own.
  • Insanely robust and accurate reliable movement.
  • Glidelock for hot and cool days.
  • I wish Rolex would do more transparent casebacks.
Reply
·

Congratulations! That’s a great watch and a very good review . Wear it in good health !

·

Great review. I'm not into the Rolex line-up, but they make great watches.

That Aquanaut is stunning.

·
100misenuf

Congratulations! That’s a great watch and a very good review . Wear it in good health !

Thank you🙏

·
KristianG

Great review. I'm not into the Rolex line-up, but they make great watches.

That Aquanaut is stunning.

Cheers👍

·

Both nice watches and great review.

·

Nicely done. Great watch.

·

Congratulations...beautiful watch!

Someone who values watches over food...

Image
·
ChronoGuy

Congratulations...beautiful watch!

Someone who values watches over food...

Image

hahaha love it.

·

I like your writing style. Maybe you should consider making a career out of this haha. I’m personally not a fan of the Yatch Master range except for this particular one. Imo the best variation of Yatch Master and a really good looking watch overall(I might be biased because I like rose gold watches and currently don’t own any). Wear it in good health!

·

Awesome review and impressive balls or banj account here 😅

·

The only upside to how hard it is to get many Rolexes is that people are becoming more aware of more of their watches. I recall the much-loved Milgause being the step-child of the sports family. The OP was just the “cheap” one. And maybe it’s just the name, but the Yachtmaster…well it just wasn’t for everybody.

I think flexers and watch enthusiasts alike are giving the “lesser” Rolexes a second look and finding a lot to like.

This specific watch is one I would not have like a few years ago, but my tastes have changed in often surprising ways. I’ve become a fan of gold, and could actually see myself wearing a legit gold watch. Of course the bank doesn’t agree, but what do they know? Thanks for the review.

·
MaverikMe

I like your writing style. Maybe you should consider making a career out of this haha. I’m personally not a fan of the Yatch Master range except for this particular one. Imo the best variation of Yatch Master and a really good looking watch overall(I might be biased because I like rose gold watches and currently don’t own any). Wear it in good health!

Thank you for reading it! Appreciate your kind words!!

·
mluciano

Awesome review and impressive balls or banj account here 😅

Neither unfortunately 😂

·
thekris

The only upside to how hard it is to get many Rolexes is that people are becoming more aware of more of their watches. I recall the much-loved Milgause being the step-child of the sports family. The OP was just the “cheap” one. And maybe it’s just the name, but the Yachtmaster…well it just wasn’t for everybody.

I think flexers and watch enthusiasts alike are giving the “lesser” Rolexes a second look and finding a lot to like.

This specific watch is one I would not have like a few years ago, but my tastes have changed in often surprising ways. I’ve become a fan of gold, and could actually see myself wearing a legit gold watch. Of course the bank doesn’t agree, but what do they know? Thanks for the review.

Thank you. I very much agree with your observations also, I think more and more enthusiasts are trying to look for "value" in various collections and sometimes there are gems like this one. My tastes have also changed over the years, and as I get older, I do appreciate a touch of gold here and there now. The YM really gets you in very smoothly.

·
ChronoGuy

Congratulations...beautiful watch!

Someone who values watches over food...

Image

Freaks! Google gaggle, one of us one of us!🤣

·

Thanks for the great read. I love the look of this thing and you’ve alerted me to the fact it’s not so expensive..

I previously owned the rare 5165A Aquanaut in 38mm - a blessing for smaller wrists. I see this YM also comes in 37mm - maybe that would be a good fit for you (or me..)

Image
·
Justingalore

Thanks for the great read. I love the look of this thing and you’ve alerted me to the fact it’s not so expensive..

I previously owned the rare 5165A Aquanaut in 38mm - a blessing for smaller wrists. I see this YM also comes in 37mm - maybe that would be a good fit for you (or me..)

Image

Stunning shot!! Despite having small wrists, I prefer the look of the larger "modern" 40mm haha, am I compensating for something? maybe lol

·

Lovely watch. Wear it well. I think the 40mm is the best size for the YM. 37 is too small for a watch of this type. I also wish Rolex made a no-date (and therefore no cyclops) steel sports watch with a black dial and a Yachtmaster black bezel. That would be amazing.

·

Congratulations and a great review!

·

Great review of an understated watch ,my wife loves her 40mm

Image
·

Congrats! Thanks for the review!

·
garbageman

Congrats! Thanks for the review!

Cheers!

·

I think as far as gold watches go, this one is quite nice and not crazy expensive (even though all gold watches are crazy expensive in their own way).

Do you know what kind of spring bars does this use and does it take normal straps?

·
UnsignedCrown

I think as far as gold watches go, this one is quite nice and not crazy expensive (even though all gold watches are crazy expensive in their own way).

Do you know what kind of spring bars does this use and does it take normal straps?

Thank you. It uses 20mm gold spring bars. I believe it can take most 20mm straps though I personally would never change it for anything else other than the OF it comes with!

·

Definitely a well informed review!!

·
tokyo_watch_guy

Thank you. It uses 20mm gold spring bars. I believe it can take most 20mm straps though I personally would never change it for anything else other than the OF it comes with!

Thanks, I have never seen this strap removed and I probably wouldn't either. I was asking more so because it seemed like the perfect opportunity to move away from "normal" spring bars. They are quite fragile after all. The ones Rolex use are quite good but still the points where it connects to the case are so small and when you yank it, it will break. Maybe in a few years there will be also OysterBars 😀 seem like the sort of thing Rolex would do to make it that little bit more robust, just like with the metal inside.

·

Congratulations on a beautiful timepiece.

Great in depth review and I personally think it looks good on your wrist.

·
EdWhite1964

Congratulations on a beautiful timepiece.

Great in depth review and I personally think it looks good on your wrist.

Thanks my friend! I really fell for this watch😊

·
UnsignedCrown

Thanks, I have never seen this strap removed and I probably wouldn't either. I was asking more so because it seemed like the perfect opportunity to move away from "normal" spring bars. They are quite fragile after all. The ones Rolex use are quite good but still the points where it connects to the case are so small and when you yank it, it will break. Maybe in a few years there will be also OysterBars 😀 seem like the sort of thing Rolex would do to make it that little bit more robust, just like with the metal inside.

Oh right yeah, its crazy isnt it when you think about it, many watches that cost multiples of this Rolex are all still secured to a very simple spring bar. The absolute confidence the swiss have in their spring bars is immense 😂 I do respect Rolex that it uses Gold Spring bars rather than SS spring bars though, some brands dont bother doing that which I find is crazy.

·

Awesome post! 🤩

Thank you for sharing this with us

Keep up the good work 🙌🏾

🍻