First of all, I like gadgets in general.
Second, watches symbolize independence for me. My first big investment with my first paycheck was in a watch, and I felt great because it looked good. So I got interested in getting more.
Third, I fell in love with the history behind watches and how much they influenced modern culture in more than 200 years.
Fourth, they look nice.
Oh my! That's exactly what I have been doing, goofing around straps recently!
I have a Royale but I didn't like the initial metal strap because it was a bit too bulky and to adjust it, it is finicky at best.
But I recently bought myself a spring bar removal tool, since I want to goof around straps/bracelets more - going to give a bit of a pause buying watches per se - but I didn't want to go to the watchmaker every time just to change it. At first I bought some aftermarket rubber straps, and although they are decent looking, I wish I could get a comfier option. So I thought about the A158 I had.
The strap is from an used A158 I bought for myself, since I gave my original one to mom. I loved the metal strap on it, it feels comfortable on my wrist and the adjustable clasp is far easier to use and to adjust than the folding links biz - I can kinda nail the nail the micro-adjustment holes with the same tool, but why not mix two different watches at the same time?
Turns out the result was a bit silly, but it works. the A158 strap is far thinner than the AE1200 but otherwise it looks good as well. If anything, it's my guilty pleasure to use a big watch with a tiny strap.
And this is how the twin looks like. A bit stiff because the strap is thicker than the original, but you could rock it, I suppose.
Me being a resident of a tropical country trying to join this discussion:
But aren't there G-Shocks that can resist cold temperatures? I heard of Pro-Trek but I doubt you'd rock it as a fashion piece
Maybe it explains why the alarm is a low buzz instead of a chime/loud sound... It definitely works in terms of drawing your attention out of nowhere, but it feels more like a cicada is performing a warmup on your wrist. Quite a funny trivia complication, not that I'd use it much besides fidgeting with the watch, if much.
I have many better alarm watches than this (although all are from the dreaded post-Quartz era), however there's not many watches that are like this, and which is why I like its oddity factor. But the main interest point for me is the design, since this is the second vintage watch I got, and the first one of the "steel square" kind that many 70s watch designs seem to share
Is it good? Is it bad? Is it ugly?
Or, as I said it, a standard kind of movement from the day?
Sadly I wish I had the knowledge to answer that precisely 😢 Luckily there is an ad in Chrono24 of a watch of the same reference number as mine (10693), and the movement shown in the ad is similar to what is on mine:
What I could describe with my newfound knowledge on movements, it's a generic Swiss movement with 17 jewels, maybe the standard tough stuff from the day, since it seems like Technos used it lots on watches from that era.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the authentic presence for this person or brand.