The Rolex Crown looks wrong on A Bezel looks wrong on B. They could both be legit or both be fake. They could even be Frankenstein watches for all I know. Missing markers could be a camera issue or a Rolex QC issue.
My knowledge of Rolex is weak. However I can't see Rolex making a watch where the second hand is not capped, so the it's post could be seen. So B is genuine. But🙄 The lume on B seems sparse!
Assuming both bracelets are originals, there is a mismatch on the lugs to bracelet on B. A has better alignment.
As phat-tony said, the indices are not aligned on A.
Hard to be certain in photos but I would say A is fake. A is a modern Rolex copy with the crown under the 6, the jubilee bracelet doesn’t fit closely in between the lugs and the polishing looks off . The hour markers are also misaligned .. . B is an older DateJust model that I think is genuine.
My knowledge of Rolex is weak. However I can't see Rolex making a watch where the second hand is not capped, so the it's post could be seen. So B is genuine. But🙄 The lume on B seems sparse!
Assuming both bracelets are originals, there is a mismatch on the lugs to bracelet on B. A has better alignment.
As phat-tony said, the indices are not aligned on A.
So, possibly B🤔
Great analysis Mr Eliminator ! B is the real one from 1994, A is the fake from Turkey ðÂÂÂ
The Rolex Crown looks wrong on A Bezel looks wrong on B. They could both be legit or both be fake. They could even be Frankenstein watches for all I know. Missing markers could be a camera issue or a Rolex QC issue.
In this case : B is real (1994) > A is fake (Turkey)
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
I will say the answer later
I will say the answer later
I will give you my choice between A and B later
Definitely B
B 🤷
Just guessing is it B with the Lume dots?
The Rolex Crown looks wrong on A Bezel looks wrong on B. They could both be legit or both be fake. They could even be Frankenstein watches for all I know. Missing markers could be a camera issue or a Rolex QC issue.
I'm no Rolex expert, never owned one but I'd say that A just looks a little too chunky for me. So B is for Bad!
B is real. Hour markers on dial of A are not set right
B the markers. They seem cheap and way off.
But to be honest both seemed to be replicas. maybe is the camera angle but on picture A the hour markers are a bit off:
My knowledge of Rolex is weak. However I can't see Rolex making a watch where the second hand is not capped, so the it's post could be seen. So B is genuine. But🙄 The lume on B seems sparse!
Assuming both bracelets are originals, there is a mismatch on the lugs to bracelet on B. A has better alignment.
As phat-tony said, the indices are not aligned on A.
So, possibly B🤔
In A you have finished bracelet on polished case whereas in B there seems to be continuity between case and bracelet.
Obviously I know f...k all, so it's just something I noticed
Bad pics, but I'll go ahead and say B is the copy. Indices and minute track seem off and no crown between Swiss and Made.
Hard to be certain in photos but I would say A is fake. A is a modern Rolex copy with the crown under the 6, the jubilee bracelet doesn’t fit closely in between the lugs and the polishing looks off . The hour markers are also misaligned .. . B is an older DateJust model that I think is genuine.
B
C, all is copy. 😶🌫️
In A you have finished bracelet on polished case whereas in B there seems to be continuity between case and bracelet.
Obviously I know f...k all, so it's just something I noticed
B is the real one ! ð¯ðÂÂÂ
My knowledge of Rolex is weak. However I can't see Rolex making a watch where the second hand is not capped, so the it's post could be seen. So B is genuine. But🙄 The lume on B seems sparse!
Assuming both bracelets are originals, there is a mismatch on the lugs to bracelet on B. A has better alignment.
As phat-tony said, the indices are not aligned on A.
So, possibly B🤔
Great analysis Mr Eliminator ! B is the real one from 1994, A is the fake from Turkey ðÂÂÂ
B the markers. They seem cheap and way off.
But to be honest both seemed to be replicas. maybe is the camera angle but on picture A the hour markers are a bit off:
B is the real one from 1994, A is a fake from Turkey !
B is real. Hour markers on dial of A are not set right
ð¯
I'm no Rolex expert, never owned one but I'd say that A just looks a little too chunky for me. So B is for Bad!
B is real > A is fake (from Turkey)
The Rolex Crown looks wrong on A Bezel looks wrong on B. They could both be legit or both be fake. They could even be Frankenstein watches for all I know. Missing markers could be a camera issue or a Rolex QC issue.
In this case : B is real (1994) > A is fake (Turkey)
Just guessing is it B with the Lume dots?
No Lume dots but B is the real one (from 1994), A is fake (from Turkey)
B 🤷
ð¯
I will give you my choice between A and B later
B is the real one ðÂÂÂ
B is real > A is fake (from Turkey)
Shows how much I know ðÂÂÂ
B is the real one ! ð¯ðÂÂÂ
Thank you brorher! That made my afternoon 😎
It's almost impossible to tell from pictures. A appears to have a bit missing from the crown.
It's almost impossible to tell from pictures. A appears to have a bit missing from the crown.
I agree, it's not easy 🤒
A is the original. I think...
A is the original. I think...
B is the original 😬