We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
quite frivolous, flows with the attire and setting. I like it
This is the ref 16234, right? Such a gorgeous piece and yes the rough look on a pure elegant watch is controversal, but why not?
This is the ref 16234, right? Such a gorgeous piece and yes the rough look on a pure elegant watch is controversal, but why not?
Yes 16234! Love the Neo-Vintage vibe 💯
Love it. Anything goes if you personally like it.
Ready for both an adventure and a fancy dinner.
Love that the Roman numerals on the bottom aren't upside down.
Love that the Roman numerals on the bottom aren't upside down.
Yeah the old Roman Dials are much nicer imho ✌🏻
Real good one mate!
This is great
Looks amazing!
Wasn't the original Fleming Bond wearing a regular Datejust?
Personally I'm a fan of single pass on anything. 🔥🔥👌🏻
Not a Rollie, but dress watch on single pass.
Wasn't the original Fleming Bond wearing a regular Datejust?
Personally I'm a fan of single pass on anything. 🔥🔥👌🏻
Not a Rollie, but dress watch on single pass.
Nice mate 🤜🏻🤛🏻I think the Fleming Bond had a Explorer but a simple DJ is close enough for me😏
Nice mate 🤜🏻🤛🏻I think the Fleming Bond had a Explorer but a simple DJ is close enough for me😏
"You can single pass any watch."
James Bond, probably
Wasn't the original Fleming Bond wearing a regular Datejust?
Personally I'm a fan of single pass on anything. 🔥🔥👌🏻
Not a Rollie, but dress watch on single pass.
I thought Ian Fleming wore an Explorer
it works!
I thought Ian Fleming wore an Explorer
Yea couldn't remember off the top of my head which sport model..just knew in the books it's wasn't a Sub.
Individuality and Rolex usually don't mix, so I really like what you've done here