Turning Time on Its Side: Embracing the GMT Master II ‘Sprite’ Destro and Future Collection Insights
I’m genuinely amazed by how much I’ve come to love wearing my new GMT Master II “Sprite.” The two-year wait and buildup of anticipation have made this experience even sweeter. Interestingly, this newfound affection hasn’t led to dissatisfaction with my other watches. Instead, it’s simply that my excitement for this particular model is so overwhelming that I find myself drawn to wearing it constantly. This preference marks a significant change from my previous habit of wearing a different watch almost every day, sometimes even two or three in a single day.
This shift in behavior has led me to reevaluate my entire watch collection. I’m contemplating whether it might be wise to sell some of my other less work watches to finance a smaller, albeit higher-quality collection. The idea is not out of a sense of obligation but rather a genuine desire to curate a collection that reflects my current tastes and appreciation for different timepieces.
I believe that many collectors undergo a transformative journey, which often includes a phase of continual evaluation and refinement of their collection. This involves identifying and parting with watches that no longer bring joy or find their way onto our wrists regularly. While I acknowledge that some timepieces are designated for special occasions and not everyday wear, I am of the opinion that the majority of watches should be enjoyed frequently. Otherwise, the investment could be more effectively allocated. At the moment, my entire Grand Seiko & Tudor collection have been essentially unworn in the last month.
In my view, if funds are already invested in a watch, that’s capital at rest. If there’s an opportunity to redirect those funds into another watch that I will appreciate and wear more often, then that’s an exchange worth making. This approach is not just about the financial aspect; it’s about enhancing the overall satisfaction and enjoyment of my collection. To me, conducting this kind of cost-benefit analysis is a rational step in refining my collection to better suit my evolving tastes and preferences.
Currently, the watches receiving the most wear in my collection are my Glashütte Originals and Rolexes, supplemented by a titanium Porsche Design Chrono or a hardened Traska for night wear. I would be reluctant to part with all of my Grand Seikos, as I hold a deep appreciation for the Hi-Beat White Birch and the 9RA2 5-Day Spring Drive Lake Suwa. My affection extends to the SBGA413 Shunbun 🌸 as well. Therefore, the only piece I'm considering letting go of is the rather thick SBGE285 “MistFlake” Spring Drive GMT.
Compare that GS GMT above ⬆️ with this Rolex GMT-Master II below ⬇️ and the difference is noticeable.
The Rolex has unsurprisingly been dominating my wrist time compared to the "MistFlake." I've particularly noticed the superior legibility of the Rolex's black lacquer dial, which features crisp, white round indices filled with Rolex's Chromalight lume. Although I previously considered the MistFlake legible, the contrast offered by the Rolex's dial—with its starkly contrasting hands and indices—has proven to be far superior. Despite the MistFlake's exquisite Zaratsu polishing and the diamond-polished indices and hands, they simply cannot match the clarity provided by a high-contrast dial. Regrettably, there's truth to the critique that Grand Seikos can be challenging to read, especially when the dial's color closely matches that of the hands and indices. I’ll include photos below to compare.
Both watches are legible, yet the Rolex offers significantly easier readability at a quick glance. Indeed, the MistFlake's beautifully textured dial and impeccably crisp indices and hands invite one to linger and appreciate its details. However, the lume on both watches is another topic altogether…
Next, let's delve into a comparison between Grand Seiko's LumiBrite and Rolex's Chromalight luminosity. I'll start with Grand Seiko. For this comparison, both watches were exposed to approximately 5 minutes of sunlight in my backyard, immediately after which the photos were taken to capture their luminescence accurately. The photo of the Grand Seiko was taken in September, ensuring that the watch was exposed to sunlight while it was still high in the sky.
Now, let's turn our attention to the Rolex 126720VTNR "Sprite." As evident from the comparison, the Rolex displays significantly brighter and more legible luminescence than the Grand Seiko. The difference in visibility between the two is striking, truly a night-and-day contrast.
We haven’t even discussed the bracelet yet! The bracelet on my model only features Rolex’s Easylink system, which, by Rolex standards, is the bare minimum compared to the far superior GlideLock system found on the Submariner, Yacht-Master on Oysterflex, Daytona on Oysterflex, and Sky-Dweller on Oysterflex. It’s puzzling why my 126505 Everose Daytona is without GlideLock, whereas the 126515 Everose Daytona on Oysterflex includes it. Rolex’s decision-making in this regard often leaves me baffled.
Despite these discrepancies, the Jubilee bracelet stands out as the most comfortable Rolex bracelet I’ve experienced. Its design is both supple and robust, offering additional comfort through the space between links that allows air to circulate. This design not only enhances wearability compared to the Oyster bracelet but also does a better job at disguising scratches, thanks to its three split polished center links. Moreover, the Jubilee bracelet adds a layer of sophistication and versatility to the watch, making it suitable for a wide range of occasions. Its ability to transition seamlessly across different settings is something I greatly appreciate for its versatility.
Comparing the Rolex GMT Master II to the Grand Seiko "Mist Flake" has been a revealing journey. Each watch brings its unique strengths to the table; the Grand Seiko with its meticulously textured dial and the exquisite craftsmanship of its indices and hands, and the Rolex with its unmatched legibility and superior luminescence thanks to the Chromalight technology. Furthermore, the Rolex's bracelet, despite its reliance on the simpler Easylink system over the more sophisticated GlideLock, still emerges as the most comfortable option, well surpassing the option on the Grand Seiko. The Jubilee bracelet, in particular, enhances the Rolex's versatility and wearability across various settings, combining durability with a design that cleverly minimizes the appearance of wear and tear.
While the Grand Seiko "Mist Flake" is undoubtedly a masterpiece in its own right, the Rolex GMT Master II "Sprite" excels in practicality, comfort, and readability, making it not only a statement piece but a highly functional one that suits a broad spectrum of occasions. This comparison has underscored the importance of considering both aesthetic appeal and everyday usability in evaluating and choosing between timepieces. The decision between the two, therefore, boils down to a matter of personal preference and the specifi qualities one values most in a watch.
Considering everything, I'm increasingly inclined towards selling the Grand Seiko "Mist Flake" to fund the purchase of a watch that I will wear and enjoy more. This decision stems from a careful comparison and reflection on what I value most in a timepiece, prioritizing practical wearability and personal satisfaction.
Thank you for taking the time to read through my reflections! I welcome your thoughts, comments, feedback, or any suggestions you might have.
Welcome to TheHoroSexual, the ultimate haven for those who pulse to the rhythm of watch hands. This account is more than a collection of timepieces; it’s a deep dive into the heart of horology, celebr...
More from TheHoroSexual
I agree with you. The Mist Flake is a wonderful watch, but wearability is an issue. Especially when compared to Rolex Jubilee.
For that reason, I haven’t picked up any Spring Drive. My GS is 37mm, quartz. It serves me well for the GADA purpose.
Nice. I'm "on the list" as well. I'm sure it was worth the wait...
I agree with you. The Mist Flake is a wonderful watch, but wearability is an issue. Especially when compared to Rolex Jubilee.
For that reason, I haven’t picked up any Spring Drive. My GS is 37mm, quartz. It serves me well for the GADA purpose.
When I purchased the MistFlake, my benchmark for comparison was the Tudor Black Bay GMT S&G, which has a thickness of approximately 15mm (I've seen figures ranging from 14.6 to 15mm). In this context, the Grand Seiko, at 13.9mm, seemed like a slimmer choice, which I initially viewed as an improvement. However, as my collection has evolved to include even thinner watches, I've started to perceive the thickness of the MistFlake as a drawback. It's interesting how issues become apparent only when we have something superior for comparison. This observation holds true not just for watches, but in many aspects of life.
How our preference start to evolve in this wonderful world of watches.
I had a similar epiphany when I was shopping around for a GS. Realized it was a watch I lOVED 2 yrs ago, but it wasn’t something that represented who I am now, not to say I won’t at some point pick up another GS.
Because of this I don’t wanna rush. I kinda feel I want to sell some pieces to get one bigger piece, but when I wear those watches, it brings joy and brings back a lot of memories, which is why I love the connection memories have to watches.
I would wear the watches, before you decide to part with them and see if you can reconnect with them. You may just be in the honey moon phase with the sprite, where everything else feels like it’s not relevant
I love the destro. Wish I could pick one up at retail
When I purchased the MistFlake, my benchmark for comparison was the Tudor Black Bay GMT S&G, which has a thickness of approximately 15mm (I've seen figures ranging from 14.6 to 15mm). In this context, the Grand Seiko, at 13.9mm, seemed like a slimmer choice, which I initially viewed as an improvement. However, as my collection has evolved to include even thinner watches, I've started to perceive the thickness of the MistFlake as a drawback. It's interesting how issues become apparent only when we have something superior for comparison. This observation holds true not just for watches, but in many aspects of life.
I agree. I once had a 43mm brietling (15mm thick), sold that and got Rolleys. Never looked back.
Well written, i understand your choice. I may have the same view, if i have Rolex ;)
One of the most comfortable Rolex pieces out there. Glad you are wearing and enjoying, I love love that piece. It makes me want to piece one together since I can’t get it at retail. A Tudor LHD Pelagos, the. A DJ or BB on jubilee/5 link 🤷♂️
Nice write up and thank you for taking the time to present this piece.
Nice. I'm "on the list" as well. I'm sure it was worth the wait...
It really was worth the way. And I rarely say that.
How our preference start to evolve in this wonderful world of watches.
I had a similar epiphany when I was shopping around for a GS. Realized it was a watch I lOVED 2 yrs ago, but it wasn’t something that represented who I am now, not to say I won’t at some point pick up another GS.
Because of this I don’t wanna rush. I kinda feel I want to sell some pieces to get one bigger piece, but when I wear those watches, it brings joy and brings back a lot of memories, which is why I love the connection memories have to watches.
I would wear the watches, before you decide to part with them and see if you can reconnect with them. You may just be in the honey moon phase with the sprite, where everything else feels like it’s not relevant
Your insight really resonates with me, highlighting the ever-evolving nature of our preferences in the fascinating world of watches. It’s intriguing how our tastes shift over time, reflecting changes in our identities and lifestyles. Your experience with Grand Seiko is a testament to this journey of discovery and reevaluation.
I appreciate your advice on taking time to wear each watch again before making any decisions. It’s a reminder of the unique stories and memories that each piece carries, which indeed form a significant part of why we cherish these timepieces. You’re right; it’s possible that my current enchantment with the Sprite might be overshadowing the value and joy the other watches bring. Reconnecting with them could offer a fresh perspective, reaffirming their place in my collection or clarifying my path forward.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and encouraging a thoughtful approach to this decision. Your perspective is invaluable as I navigate through these contemplations.
I love the destro. Wish I could pick one up at retail
With a bit of persistence and patience, securing one at retail might be more achievable than you think. Don’t give up hope just yet!
Well written, i understand your choice. I may have the same view, if i have Rolex ;)
Thank you so much for reading and sharing your thoughts. I have immense respect for Grand Seiko and the exceptional timepieces they create. I look forward to seeing how they continue to innovate, particularly in creating slimmer profiles and enhancing their bracelets. I'm excited about their future developments and remain open to revisiting the brand in the future.
One of the most comfortable Rolex pieces out there. Glad you are wearing and enjoying, I love love that piece. It makes me want to piece one together since I can’t get it at retail. A Tudor LHD Pelagos, the. A DJ or BB on jubilee/5 link 🤷♂️
Nice write up and thank you for taking the time to present this piece.
Thank you so much for your kind words and for sharing your enthusiasm! It's truly one of the most comfortable and enjoyable pieces in my collection. The idea of piecing together alternatives like a Tudor LHD Pelagos on a jubilee/5 link bracelet sounds like a creative and satisfying pursuit.
It's great to hear that you appreciate the write-up and the presentation of the piece. Let's keep celebrating our passion for these incredible timepieces! Cheers! 🥂
I agree. I once had a 43mm brietling (15mm thick), sold that and got Rolleys. Never looked back.
I'm at a point where I'm distinguishing between the watches I genuinely enjoy wearing and those I merely appreciate visually. This reflection is helping me understand my true preferences within my collection.
I love the destro. Wish I could pick one up at retail
Soooo agreed. I want it, but I don’t believe anywhere in this crazy world it is worth the gray market price (to me).
Thank you so much for reading and sharing your thoughts. I have immense respect for Grand Seiko and the exceptional timepieces they create. I look forward to seeing how they continue to innovate, particularly in creating slimmer profiles and enhancing their bracelets. I'm excited about their future developments and remain open to revisiting the brand in the future.
A song from GS Mistflake:
What I got to do To make you love me? What I got to do To make you care? What do I do When lightning strikes me? And I wake to find That you're not there?
What I got to do To make you want me? What I got to do To be heard? What do I say when it's all over, babe? Sorry seems to be the hardest word (that's right)
It's sad, so sad It's a sad, sad situation And it's getting more And more absurd
It's sad, so sad Why can't we talk it over? Oh, it seems to me That sorry seems to be The hardest word
Thanks for sharing Paul
Not worth $18,000 for sure. Also not worth trying to kiss ass to a Rolex store.
Yep, I flip flop on the list, I’ve been on it for two years, for a less desirable watch, thought about switching to the GMT Destros. ,y desire is not hype related, it’s just a really comfortable watch on jubilee and LHD. I like comfortable watches.
Anyhow it’s forced me to heavily heavily consider spending those dollars elsewhere (I’m not a Rolex fanboy either). It’s made me look harder at what I want in a watch and what will ultimately get me to wear it and have value to me. EOD, it is t worth 18K to me.
Damn! I wish that you were thinking about selling your Mistflake a year from now, and I'd be the first in the queue banging down your door! Unfortunately, I'm in the midst of saving up for my remodel... and every day, my wife finds a way to increase the budget!
A song from GS Mistflake:
What I got to do To make you love me? What I got to do To make you care? What do I do When lightning strikes me? And I wake to find That you're not there?
What I got to do To make you want me? What I got to do To be heard? What do I say when it's all over, babe? Sorry seems to be the hardest word (that's right)
It's sad, so sad It's a sad, sad situation And it's getting more And more absurd
It's sad, so sad Why can't we talk it over? Oh, it seems to me That sorry seems to be The hardest word
Sorry Seems to Be the Hardest Word By Elton John?
Damn! I wish that you were thinking about selling your Mistflake a year from now, and I'd be the first in the queue banging down your door! Unfortunately, I'm in the midst of saving up for my remodel... and every day, my wife finds a way to increase the budget!
I might not sell it immediately since there's no pressing need for me to part with it. The post is more of a stream of consciousness, reflecting my current thoughts on the collection. It serves to illustrate my thought process and how I'm considering my collection at this moment. I’d love for you to own my MistFlake, as I know it would find an amazing home with you, my friend.
I’m a major adherent to the idea of expanding/consolidating collections based on your tastes and preferences. The only unworn watches that should be kept, in my opinion, are sentimental pieces (and in many cases, even then, it’s better to learn how to let go).
Selling off, giving away, or disposing of things in your life that no longer get use or bring you joy is an excellent way to avoid accumulating in excess. In the case of watches, it’s a distinct way to enjoy the hobby and throughly explore your taste(s) by challenging yourself with the question of “should I let this go?”.
I might not sell it immediately since there's no pressing need for me to part with it. The post is more of a stream of consciousness, reflecting my current thoughts on the collection. It serves to illustrate my thought process and how I'm considering my collection at this moment. I’d love for you to own my MistFlake, as I know it would find an amazing home with you, my friend.
You are a scholar and a gentleman!
You know my opinions on this topic Paul. I think you’re tracking perfectly with the evolution of your preferences and how you want to make changes happen. We are all constantly moving and changing!
While I’d be thankful to own either the Mistflake or the Sprite, and blown out of the water to own both, you have a great way of building perspective here. It’s all about what you want to wear more, what brings more value to both your life and your interest, and honestly what keeps your attention! The mistflake seems like it’s been a great one to own, but all good things come to an end. I’m sure what the mistflake ends up funding will be superb my friend. Can’t wait to keep watching your journey!!
Sorry Seems to Be the Hardest Word By Elton John?
Yes, nice
You know my opinions on this topic Paul. I think you’re tracking perfectly with the evolution of your preferences and how you want to make changes happen. We are all constantly moving and changing!
While I’d be thankful to own either the Mistflake or the Sprite, and blown out of the water to own both, you have a great way of building perspective here. It’s all about what you want to wear more, what brings more value to both your life and your interest, and honestly what keeps your attention! The mistflake seems like it’s been a great one to own, but all good things come to an end. I’m sure what the mistflake ends up funding will be superb my friend. Can’t wait to keep watching your journey!!
Your insight always hits home, my friend. It's heartening to have someone who understands the evolving nature of collecting so well. The journey of collecting is indeed about finding joy and value in what we choose to surround ourselves with. Both the Mistflake and the Sprite have their unique places, and deciding what's next is part of the adventure. Rest assured, whatever the Mistflake makes way for will be shared with all of you. Here’s to the future acquisitions and the many more chapters we'll witness in this horological journey. Thanks for being a part of it and for your unwavering support!
I’m a major adherent to the idea of expanding/consolidating collections based on your tastes and preferences. The only unworn watches that should be kept, in my opinion, are sentimental pieces (and in many cases, even then, it’s better to learn how to let go).
Selling off, giving away, or disposing of things in your life that no longer get use or bring you joy is an excellent way to avoid accumulating in excess. In the case of watches, it’s a distinct way to enjoy the hobby and throughly explore your taste(s) by challenging yourself with the question of “should I let this go?”.
I wholeheartedly agree with your philosophy on curating a collection. It's a thoughtful approach to consider each piece's personal value and utility. Sentimentality does have its place, but I also believe in the freedom and clarity that comes with making space for what truly resonates with us at present. Your perspective on conscious collecting and the introspection it requires is enlightening—it encourages a meaningful engagement with the hobby. The question 'Should I let this go?' is indeed a powerful one, and I appreciate you articulating this so eloquently. It's always enriching to exchange views with someone who shares a deep appreciation for these intricacies. Thank you for that!
Your insight always hits home, my friend. It's heartening to have someone who understands the evolving nature of collecting so well. The journey of collecting is indeed about finding joy and value in what we choose to surround ourselves with. Both the Mistflake and the Sprite have their unique places, and deciding what's next is part of the adventure. Rest assured, whatever the Mistflake makes way for will be shared with all of you. Here’s to the future acquisitions and the many more chapters we'll witness in this horological journey. Thanks for being a part of it and for your unwavering support!
Always my friend! Have a great night!
I want the GMT Master II in all colors. Is that too much to ask?
Congratulation to your GMT. I fully understand your appreciation for it. Rolex might be ”boring” but they sure know how to make comfortable watches. I have too many watches but I’m not yet worried about the ones that gets limited wrist time. They will have their moments in the limelight.
At the moment I don’t have to choose between any GS and Rolex. I would love to ad a Spring Drive but I haven’t found my model yet.