Cyclops are hideous and ruin symmetry. Tudor is trying to position themselves as the cool brand for young adventurers, they aren't going to slap a wart on the crystal that screams "I can't see anymore" like their sibling making watches for old people. 🤭
Unpopular opinion here, but I like a cyclops when done well and on the right kind of watch. Cyclops add a bit of a vintage vibe that would suit this new Tudor well, as it harkens clearly back to the GMT-Master models of yore.
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
Cyclops are hideous and ruin symmetry. Tudor is trying to position themselves as the cool brand for young adventurers, they aren't going to slap a wart on the crystal that screams "I can't see anymore" like their sibling making watches for old people. 🤭
A cyclops would edge it even closer to a 6542 homage.
It should have a date window at 6 o'clock or no date. And it should be bigger
Unpopular opinion here, but I like a cyclops when done well and on the right kind of watch. Cyclops add a bit of a vintage vibe that would suit this new Tudor well, as it harkens clearly back to the GMT-Master models of yore.
All date windows should have a Cyclops! 🤣
Would be much improved without any date at all!!
I would be good with a cyclops as an optional varient - I like it, but get why others don't.
It should have a color matched datewheel
Several thousands of dollars you're paying and they can't even bother to get the datewheel to not look like a 15 dollar Aliexpress watch
Cyclops are perfect grime collectors. Never looks clean after a few years, unless you bleach the watch, which not recommended