Both of them, having a royal oak or a nautilus it’s like having the hottest and classiest partner in the party. The difference it’s you’re gonna start a conversation with the royal oak 99% of the time because it’s the more commercially known.
I would pick AP with perpetual calendar and moon phase complications. Patek Nautilus is nice too. But if I had to choose between the two, it would be the AP. Of course this is very personal and subjective. It’s a tough choice. 🍻
Honestly, I'd be selling either and just take the one that would yield a larger cashout. But if we're pretending I'd keep it...
I hate the Nautilus case style less, but a triple calendar is the complication that does not offend in my book. I'm not sure what that mess on the Patek dial is... oh, it has pushers. Such a shame, as I think the PP looks smaller (is better) but I'll take the AP in this case.
Honestly, I'd be selling either and just take the one that would yield a larger cashout. But if we're pretending I'd keep it...
I hate the Nautilus case style less, but a triple calendar is the complication that does not offend in my book. I'm not sure what that mess on the Patek dial is... oh, it has pushers. Such a shame, as I think the PP looks smaller (is better) but I'll take the AP in this case.
LOL....that mess on the Patek dial is the flyback chronograph counter.
Honestly not a fan of either (would also sell and use the funds for something else like @OscarKlosoff ), but would choose AP between the two. I just see a monkey face/ears whenever I see a Nautilus. Don't @ me.
I always dreamed of having Fast Cars, Fast Boats, Fast Bikes and Fast Women. Sadly the Fast women took all the other stuff and i just left with a few watches.
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
AP, because I think it looks better.
Both of them, having a royal oak or a nautilus it’s like having the hottest and classiest partner in the party. The difference it’s you’re gonna start a conversation with the royal oak 99% of the time because it’s the more commercially known.
Please sir, may I have the one in steel? 😛
I would pick AP with perpetual calendar and moon phase complications. Patek Nautilus is nice too. But if I had to choose between the two, it would be the AP. Of course this is very personal and subjective. It’s a tough choice. 🍻
Honestly, I'd be selling either and just take the one that would yield a larger cashout. But if we're pretending I'd keep it...
I hate the Nautilus case style less, but a triple calendar is the complication that does not offend in my book. I'm not sure what that mess on the Patek dial is... oh, it has pushers. Such a shame, as I think the PP looks smaller (is better) but I'll take the AP in this case.
nautillus. and can i have the steel version pls
Please sir, may I have the one in steel? 😛
Only if your AD will sell you one 😂
nautillus. and can i have the steel version pls
You have to get in the waiting list, behind me...lol
Honestly, I'd be selling either and just take the one that would yield a larger cashout. But if we're pretending I'd keep it...
I hate the Nautilus case style less, but a triple calendar is the complication that does not offend in my book. I'm not sure what that mess on the Patek dial is... oh, it has pushers. Such a shame, as I think the PP looks smaller (is better) but I'll take the AP in this case.
LOL....that mess on the Patek dial is the flyback chronograph counter.
Honestly not a fan of either (would also sell and use the funds for something else like @OscarKlosoff ), but would choose AP between the two. I just see a monkey face/ears whenever I see a Nautilus. Don't @ me.
@chronoslice, you rang? 😂😛
@chronoslice, you rang? 😂😛
Nop, Not me 🥺