Do you like the new monochromatic Cartier Santos Dual Time?

.

Reply
·

Based on this picture I do not. The problem is legibility. Maybe it is my eyesight, but it took me a couple of seconds to see what time it is showing. I like Santos, but more legible. Maybe when I see it on the wrist I will change my mind.

·

No.

·

I like its styling and the santos almost always looks cool. BUT: The movement is supposedly based on a Sellita SW330 which costs somewhere around 400$. At a retail price close to 10.000$ I would definitely not buy this one… 😅

·

Yes. Yes I do.

·

No. Boring colour. Hate Roman numerals. Circular small seconds looks weird on a square watch

·

Change the dial colors then yes

·

Personally I rather like the design and it’s dual time function. It’s a large square watch and that’s where I have an issue. As such it does lack the finesse of the medium sized Santos de Cartier. Overall I’ll withhold final judgement until I can try it on.

·

They won’t announce what the movement is inside that watch it’s probably not theirs.

·

I like it but not enough to buy it. I'd prefer it be an in-house movement. I believe it's a little larger than the current large. Would need to see it on the wrist first. The color works for me.

·
jon1967

They won’t announce what the movement is inside that watch it’s probably not theirs.

It's definitely "outsourced", or so I heard.

·

Normally I don't go for square watches but this is nice

·

Too silver colored for me. Just my opinion

Image
·

It somehow reminds me of the clock from the SOAD Mezmerize cover so… yes

Image
·

The circular sub dial kind of throws me off a little. I’m no photoshopist, but I reckon if it was also square it might look a little more cohesive.

Still, fair play to them for trying something different.

·

Can someone explain to me why they use IIII instead of IV for the 4?

·
smackdaddy

Can someone explain to me why they use IIII instead of IV for the 4?

It is a convention in clockmaking going back centuries.

·
smackdaddy

Can someone explain to me why they use IIII instead of IV for the 4?

I've heard several explanations. One is that initially, Roman numeral 4 was IIII and not IV. Then, I heard that it was easier for the watchmakers to manufacture IIII than IV. But the best explanations is symmetry, as explained here: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-XpzG77eksc. It makes most sense to me.

·

I want to love it, but no. This is the least interesting dial I've seen from Cartier in a long while. And the second time-zone is represented in a small 12-hour sub-dial doesn't make it all that functional, does it? At a glance, you still have to do the mental math to know the actual time you're tracking. If you're going to do that, why not go further with a small day-night window as well? SMH.

·

The silver dial is stunning, but for me, I like a more simple dial for the Santos. Just my personal taste. 😉