I don't typically prefer date complications. But when it is on a watch, I like it best at the 6 o'clock position (for better symmetry). Then, just once a month, it then fits perfectly on the dial. Kismet.
I hope one day someone explains exactly how a 6 o’clock date is any more symmetrical than a date at 3 o’clock (or 9 o’clock or 12 o’clock).
Whatever perceived lack of symmetry exists with a date at the 3 o’clock also exists with a date at the 6 o’clock where the date wheel is offset by an index or numeral on the opposite side of the dial.
I hope one day someone explains exactly how a 6 o’clock date is any more symmetrical than a date at 3 o’clock (or 9 o’clock or 12 o’clock).
Whatever perceived lack of symmetry exists with a date at the 3 o’clock also exists with a date at the 6 o’clock where the date wheel is offset by an index or numeral on the opposite side of the dial.
Rant over….
Or is it?
When the date is at 6 o'clock, the left and right side of the dial have an equilibrium that is missing when the date is at 3 o'clock, for example. (Although I suppose the same could be said for a date at 12 o'clock.)
I find a date at 3 o'clock (or 4:00 or 4:30) to disrupt the balance of the dial.
I certainly have watches with a date at the "3", but it's not my first preference. But if I really want a watch, I sometimes don't really have a choice.
When the date is at 6 o'clock, the left and right side of the dial have an equilibrium that is missing when the date is at 3 o'clock, for example. (Although I suppose the same could be said for a date at 12 o'clock.)
I find a date at 3 o'clock (or 4:00 or 4:30) to disrupt the balance of the dial.
I certainly have watches with a date at the "3", but it's not my first preference. But if I really want a watch, I sometimes don't really have a choice.
But doesn't that mean a 3 o'clock date has a top and bottom equilibrium that is missing when the date is at 6 o'clock? And a 6 o'clock date disrupts the top-bottom balance of the dial?
No matter where the date window is located, it is always offset by an index or a numeral on the opposite side of the dial and the symmetry is no more or less regardless of where the date window is placed (unless it is placed somewhere like 4:30 where there is no corresponding index on the opposite side of the dial).
I'm certainly not suggesting what you should and shouldn't like. And I've heard the symmetry argument many times. It just seems to me like "symmetry" isn't the correct word for what makes the 6 o'clock date window appealing to so many.
But doesn't that mean a 3 o'clock date has a top and bottom equilibrium that is missing when the date is at 6 o'clock? And a 6 o'clock date disrupts the top-bottom balance of the dial?
No matter where the date window is located, it is always offset by an index or a numeral on the opposite side of the dial and the symmetry is no more or less regardless of where the date window is placed (unless it is placed somewhere like 4:30 where there is no corresponding index on the opposite side of the dial).
I'm certainly not suggesting what you should and shouldn't like. And I've heard the symmetry argument many times. It just seems to me like "symmetry" isn't the correct word for what makes the 6 o'clock date window appealing to so many.
Certainly an ongoing debate, particularly in the world of art & design. I would just say that my eye seems to look at a watch dial and orient along the vertical axis and not the horizontal. Hence my response. I say "symmetry" because of the left/right mirroring along the vertical axis (12 to 6) of the dial. I don't find myself orienting a "symmetry" the same way along the horizontal axis (9 to 3) into upper/lower halfs.
I actually like this better than the oris big crown.
I actually have both an Oris BCPD and this Bulova. Each have their attractive points that make them a pleasure to wear. The Bulova is certainly more affordable.
Some brands have started to put the date at the 12 and I actually think this is my favourite position but I would be tempted to just set it to 12 most of the time.
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
What about February?
What about February?
February still has a 6th day
February still has a 6th day
Oops....brain fart😕
Oops....brain fart😕
Happens to the best of us
That’s cool!
It’s like The Oris Kermit except your waiting for the 6
What if the date was an entire hand itself? 😎
what reference is this
I hope one day someone explains exactly how a 6 o’clock date is any more symmetrical than a date at 3 o’clock (or 9 o’clock or 12 o’clock).
Whatever perceived lack of symmetry exists with a date at the 3 o’clock also exists with a date at the 6 o’clock where the date wheel is offset by an index or numeral on the opposite side of the dial.
Rant over….
Or is it?
I hope one day someone explains exactly how a 6 o’clock date is any more symmetrical than a date at 3 o’clock (or 9 o’clock or 12 o’clock).
Whatever perceived lack of symmetry exists with a date at the 3 o’clock also exists with a date at the 6 o’clock where the date wheel is offset by an index or numeral on the opposite side of the dial.
Rant over….
Or is it?
When the date is at 6 o'clock, the left and right side of the dial have an equilibrium that is missing when the date is at 3 o'clock, for example. (Although I suppose the same could be said for a date at 12 o'clock.)
I find a date at 3 o'clock (or 4:00 or 4:30) to disrupt the balance of the dial.
I certainly have watches with a date at the "3", but it's not my first preference. But if I really want a watch, I sometimes don't really have a choice.
what reference is this
96B230
Hard to find in good condition. I got lucky and grabbed one on eBay just after it was posted.
What if the date was an entire hand itself? 😎
Pointer Date, excellent cheat code👍🏾
I actually like this better than the oris big crown.
When the date is at 6 o'clock, the left and right side of the dial have an equilibrium that is missing when the date is at 3 o'clock, for example. (Although I suppose the same could be said for a date at 12 o'clock.)
I find a date at 3 o'clock (or 4:00 or 4:30) to disrupt the balance of the dial.
I certainly have watches with a date at the "3", but it's not my first preference. But if I really want a watch, I sometimes don't really have a choice.
But doesn't that mean a 3 o'clock date has a top and bottom equilibrium that is missing when the date is at 6 o'clock? And a 6 o'clock date disrupts the top-bottom balance of the dial?
No matter where the date window is located, it is always offset by an index or a numeral on the opposite side of the dial and the symmetry is no more or less regardless of where the date window is placed (unless it is placed somewhere like 4:30 where there is no corresponding index on the opposite side of the dial).
I'm certainly not suggesting what you should and shouldn't like. And I've heard the symmetry argument many times. It just seems to me like "symmetry" isn't the correct word for what makes the 6 o'clock date window appealing to so many.
But doesn't that mean a 3 o'clock date has a top and bottom equilibrium that is missing when the date is at 6 o'clock? And a 6 o'clock date disrupts the top-bottom balance of the dial?
No matter where the date window is located, it is always offset by an index or a numeral on the opposite side of the dial and the symmetry is no more or less regardless of where the date window is placed (unless it is placed somewhere like 4:30 where there is no corresponding index on the opposite side of the dial).
I'm certainly not suggesting what you should and shouldn't like. And I've heard the symmetry argument many times. It just seems to me like "symmetry" isn't the correct word for what makes the 6 o'clock date window appealing to so many.
Certainly an ongoing debate, particularly in the world of art & design. I would just say that my eye seems to look at a watch dial and orient along the vertical axis and not the horizontal. Hence my response. I say "symmetry" because of the left/right mirroring along the vertical axis (12 to 6) of the dial. I don't find myself orienting a "symmetry" the same way along the horizontal axis (9 to 3) into upper/lower halfs.
I actually like this better than the oris big crown.
I actually have both an Oris BCPD and this Bulova. Each have their attractive points that make them a pleasure to wear. The Bulova is certainly more affordable.
Some brands have started to put the date at the 12 and I actually think this is my favourite position but I would be tempted to just set it to 12 most of the time.
96B230
Hard to find in good condition. I got lucky and grabbed one on eBay just after it was posted.
thank you!
I really believe it must fit the time piece. Date/Day features are nor for every one. I really like how they placed it on the piece.
Thanks for sharing!
Beautiful watch.