Well, that highly depends on what are you after.
I see you have a Seagull 1963 Moonphase too, so you must be interested in mechanical complications as well. I am pretty much fond of my Seagull, it was a second watch in my collection and I've received the brew a few weeks after it. Even though they're both chronographs, they're very unlike. Yes, Seagull has a beautiful column-wheel mechanism compared to the mecha-quartz (I wouldn’t say it’s the same as quartz btw) one in Brew, but to me it’s the only advantage. The case finishing, dial details and strap (mine had a poor quality NATO one, didn’t like the color & feel) look cheaper to me. Also, if something goes wrong with it, the service might be multiple times the price of the watch itself, which bothers me quite a bit, because it breaks the logic of a timepiece that’ll last you a lifetime. I always get a feeling with a Seagull that it’s a nice watch, yes, but an expendable one, so I don’t have a strong attachment to it.
Brew on the other hand is quite precious to me. This watch/brand is because I have started collection at all, since I’m into coffee brewing and I wanted something in a watch to be connected to that. It looks distinct, has a great bracelet (esp. for a price) and it doesn’t show that much it’s a quartz because main chrono-second hand works as a mechanical one. Because of its uniqueness in design and theme, it’s the watch I would left in my collection if I had to sell all others. Yes, it would be better to have some kind of limited edition with automatic movement, but it’s a great watch nonetheless. I know many other models that cost around 300-400$~ with similar or same movement, so I wouldn’t say it overpriced, at least I never thought so. Sorry for a long speech, but it’s always interesting to me to express some thoughts on this matter :)