It would be nice if the unit of measure was apparent. My guess is that the value is supposed to be in inches?
IMO a slight change that will include an automatic conversion between inches and centimeters would be both less confusing for those of us living in the metric world and more informative for the provincial natives of inchland.
Nice to have I guess. Not really necessary I think.
People like to know a person's wrist size when seeing their wrist shots so they can gauge how that watch would look on their wrist. Not a mandatory field 👍
It would be nice if the unit of measure was apparent. My guess is that the value is supposed to be in inches?
IMO a slight change that will include an automatic conversion between inches and centimeters would be both less confusing for those of us living in the metric world and more informative for the provincial natives of inchland.
Everyone has probable noticed by now that I have the perfectly sized wrist (PSW). It is well known that the perfect wrist size is 6.75 inches. It is disappointing that PSW is not an option. My best guess is that you believed perfection to be obvious.
Also, if I've entered a wrist size and now want to remove it (zero it out), field validation requires me to enter something, preferably at least a value of 1!
We believe watch discussions should be fun and inclusive, not snobby and intimidating, so whether you're a seasoned veteran of the watch world or an absolute beginner, come join the conversation!
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
Nice to have I guess. Not really necessary I think.
It would be nice if the unit of measure was apparent. My guess is that the value is supposed to be in inches?
IMO a slight change that will include an automatic conversion between inches and centimeters would be both less confusing for those of us living in the metric world and more informative for the provincial natives of inchland.
Nice to have I guess. Not really necessary I think.
People like to know a person's wrist size when seeing their wrist shots so they can gauge how that watch would look on their wrist. Not a mandatory field 👍
It would be nice if the unit of measure was apparent. My guess is that the value is supposed to be in inches?
IMO a slight change that will include an automatic conversion between inches and centimeters would be both less confusing for those of us living in the metric world and more informative for the provincial natives of inchland.
Good point! 👌
I like it. I added mine already.
Really help
I like it. I added mine already.
Me, too! 🙂
This should be a feature on Tinder 🤔
@WatchCrunch - Metric or imperial? Can I choose? Feature feels a little rushed?
@WatchCrunch - Metric or imperial? Can I choose? Feature feels a little rushed?
work in progress
This should be a feature on Tinder 🤔
You know what they say about a man with a big wrist, right? Yup: they say he's allowed to wear a Panerai.
This should be a feature on Tinder 🤔
Then mine would say Humble and Good enough ! Or Fits perfectly 😂
As long as it's just wrist size, I'm fine with it.
Everyone has probable noticed by now that I have the perfectly sized wrist (PSW). It is well known that the perfect wrist size is 6.75 inches. It is disappointing that PSW is not an option. My best guess is that you believed perfection to be obvious.
work in progress
Also, if I've entered a wrist size and now want to remove it (zero it out), field validation requires me to enter something, preferably at least a value of 1!
So much for being an optional field!!
Can't we add the wrist size in centimeter ?