I do prefer the 36mm but with the old references (114270,14270). Something about the new 36 is just off for me. I guess it‘s the bracelet and the lugs that are narrower and mess up the proportions for me.
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
40mm divisive, but I’m too Husky to pull off the new 36mm
Going as large as 36mm is permissible for a tool watch like this.
This poll is fundamentally flawed as it doesn't distinguish between new 36mm with 19mm lug width and old 36mm will 20mm lug width 😕
I tried the 39 Tudor and it felt too small for me ,so I'm guessing the 40mm explorer will fit perfectly
I've tried the modern 36 a bunch of times... Wears soooo much smaller than my DJ36. I vote Explorer 40!
I do prefer the 36mm but with the old references (114270,14270). Something about the new 36 is just off for me. I guess it‘s the bracelet and the lugs that are narrower and mess up the proportions for me.