The Pilot that never went to the moon

I have to give credits to LIW because the Bulova Lunar Pilot found itself on my doorstep waiting for my return from work less than a week after I put my order with Marc. I somehow managed to unpack the quite large box and post on NWA before calling it a day.

Image

Here I must confess that buying the Lunar Pilot wasn't a quick affair as it took me some serious mental arm twisting to convince myself to buy it, because taken out of the context of the Apollo 15 so convenient "accident" with the NASA issued Omega, there's nothing really special about it: It's actually a failure.

Image

The watch worn on the moon wasn't even one made by Bulova, it was a re-badged Universal Genève prototype that was rushed to NASA where it failed the evaluation and lost it's place in history to the Omega Speedmaster. This can be easily seen when looking at the pictures from an auction that listed a UG prototype which is identical to the original Lunar Pilot, down to the same spelling mistake on the bezel.

Image

Was it on the moon? Well yes but not really. Except for a passing resemblance, the modern Lunar Pilot has nothing in common with the watch worn on the moon. But to be fair, it's pretty much the same story with the Speedmaster and it has never stopped Omega from capitalizing on this piece of history. At least in their case it never involved a watch that somehow found itself in the pocket of an Apollo crew member.

Image

So let us get back to my LE Lunar Pilot. I almost bought one of the newer 43.5mm after I managed to convince myself that it's not too large for me (it still is BTW). What stopped me was the realization that Bulova opted for a polished case on these models and I disliked it enough to pass them.

Image

The launch of Bulova Limited Edition of the Lunar Pilot was a non-event for me because I didn't care about the meteorite dial and I cared even less about the price increase that goes hand in hand with the launch of every LE.

What took me some time to catch was that the LE case was made of titanium and was finished in satin. I like titanium and the matte finish of the case is what drew me in. It's that simple.

Image

The watch came fitted with a leather pseudo NATO strap, which I don't like at all. I can live with it for a time until I'll find a more comfortable and esthetically pleasing alternative. I guess that it's still a bit better than Bulova going all in for authenticity and sending it fitted to 30cm of Velcro strap sourced from Home Depot.

Image

And so I find myself drinking coffee 53 years after the Apollo 15 landing on the moon and truly enjoying it. Yes, it does wear too large for me, yes its connection to this moon mission is only something that Bulova would really like to make you believe in, and it's also true that my passion for chronographs is long gone. But none of this matter if I find myself enjoying wearing it.

Reply
·

I perform mental gymnastics every time I see a lunar pilot post or picture regretting selling mine (I’d 3 at one time). Appreciate your honesty on the size issue and will probably use it as inspiration to re -buy …I’m going to have to try the new size model though..

That’s a beautiful looking piece though..enjoy 👍👍

·

Wasn’t UG owned by Bulova at the time? So I would definitely say that the Bulova chronograph, even if the prototype was made by UG(their subsidiary), can make that claim.

·
Slowmaster

I perform mental gymnastics every time I see a lunar pilot post or picture regretting selling mine (I’d 3 at one time). Appreciate your honesty on the size issue and will probably use it as inspiration to re -buy …I’m going to have to try the new size model though..

That’s a beautiful looking piece though..enjoy 👍👍

May I ask why you sold them?

·

Like many of us you rotate watches on a daily or near daily basis. It will be interesting to see over the next few months, as you drink your morning coffee, if you talk yourself into wearing this one more. You are at peace with your Mathey-Tissot, but you had to work at it.

I don't know how large this watch has to be based on the module that they are using. I would have less to say about it if Bulova could find a way to make it 39mm or give the lugs some downturn. But, right now it is large and flat. My de-influencing has failed yet again.

·
chronografan

Wasn’t UG owned by Bulova at the time? So I would definitely say that the Bulova chronograph, even if the prototype was made by UG(their subsidiary), can make that claim.

It's true that UG was owned by Bulova at that time but it doesn't mean a lot in the context of branding.

·
Aurelian

Like many of us you rotate watches on a daily or near daily basis. It will be interesting to see over the next few months, as you drink your morning coffee, if you talk yourself into wearing this one more. You are at peace with your Mathey-Tissot, but you had to work at it.

I don't know how large this watch has to be based on the module that they are using. I would have less to say about it if Bulova could find a way to make it 39mm or give the lugs some downturn. But, right now it is large and flat. My de-influencing has failed yet again.

It's a large movement. I saw a YT video showing how to open and change the battery and the movement is taking all the place inside, as opposed to my equally large Accutron II which has a very large plastic holder.

As to wearing frequency, well we will see how it goes. I'm not going to claim that I was smitten by the Lunar Pilot, but neither do I claim that it disappointed me. It's not going to be a favorite of mine but I'll probably end up wearing it occasionally.

·
MoonCat

May I ask why you sold them?

They weren’t being worn as much ,I loved the polished no date model but when I got a speedmaster it really did look massive….that and a pal called in a loan and I needed the cash his need was greater 🤷‍♂️

·

#1446 here!