I love my HQ. I have the 41mm blue on bracelet and it was my daily d[r]iver for well over a year, just an awesome watch. Now I really want to get other watches, such as a Pelagos and a PloP someday, and can’t justify having the HQ when I know I’ll wear the others more. It’s great, but I need to move on. Tastes change!
My predicament is that I used (read: loved) the watch so much it got a couple little dings and I’m not sure how much resale value it holds anymore. Not a deal breaker, and obviously expected, but still kind of a downer.
They’re very Sinn-esque, and also take a few small inspirations from the old school tool divers from the 70’s. I also appreciate the design language on these watches. Thankfully, Vero is a local company and I’ve met the owner and their horologist—they’re awesome and make awesome watches.
I don’t dive (yet) but I don’t put much thought about using a depth-rated watch in the water. I treat them as tools that are also jewelry, some more precious than others but still tools. I wouldn’t go into the water with a white gold Sub or a vintage Seiko, but a Tudor BB? Any of my Longines? My Vero Open Water? Absolutely. They’re timekeeping tools that were engineered to keep time wherever I go, and I’ll use them as such, whether that’s how they’re in current use or not.
commented onHas anyone here ever used a compass bezel?·
I actually have used my Alpinist for navigation while on a hike—and yes, I did get mud on my shoes. Is it advisable? No, there are obviously far better, more precise tools, but it served as a good backup in a pinch.
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.