Any Thoughts on the new Marinemaster?

Hi Crunchers,

I've been looking for a good dive watch for the better part of a year now. The one that's always been in my head is the Seiko SJE093. I love the design, I love the dimensions, I love the historical significance for the brand. But I've never pulled the trigger, due to there not being a bracket option and the price being too high. Yes I know it's officially limited, but nearly 2000 units is not really limited in my eyes.

When Seiko released the SJE Marinemasters with the 6L movements and smaller dimensions this year, I first brushed it aside; too expensive, too big, the dial looks like a CC from the Aqua Terra. But now after a few months, I've come to realize, that the new Marinemasters are basically the SJE093 unlimited and modernized in design a bit. Now I'm interested.

I know many are sad, that the design changed from the monocase MM300 and the price is up there, but with prices as low as 26% below MSRP for new watches on the grey market, I think this should get another look.

What do you guys think? Any real life experience? Any alternatives?

Reply
·

Personally, I don't like it. Seiko has a great collection of case styles, each with a strong identity and fanbase (SKX, turtle, samurai, tuna, willard, sumo, shogun, MM, 62MAS) and I don't understand this push to homogenize the Marinemaster heritage into yet another 62MAS re-issue, as if we didn't have enough of them already.

The MM case is my favorite of the bunch so naturally I can only be disappointed that this fankenwatch bears the name Marinemaster when it doesn't look like a MM. The MM never had baton indices either. Nor a 3 hour crown. Nor a 15/30/45 bezel. The only thing "Marinemaster" about this watch is the text on the dial. This is just wrong. 😕

For this kind of money you can buy a real MM300 on the secondary market, or an SLA with an 8L movement for <$2000. That would be my pick.

·

I had it on my wrist, it looks really really good. Go and check it out in person. Don't compare it to SJE093 though, it's not trying to be anything, it's it's own thing.

·
Beanna

Personally, I don't like it. Seiko has a great collection of case styles, each with a strong identity and fanbase (SKX, turtle, samurai, tuna, willard, sumo, shogun, MM, 62MAS) and I don't understand this push to homogenize the Marinemaster heritage into yet another 62MAS re-issue, as if we didn't have enough of them already.

The MM case is my favorite of the bunch so naturally I can only be disappointed that this fankenwatch bears the name Marinemaster when it doesn't look like a MM. The MM never had baton indices either. Nor a 3 hour crown. Nor a 15/30/45 bezel. The only thing "Marinemaster" about this watch is the text on the dial. This is just wrong. 😕

For this kind of money you can buy a real MM300 on the secondary market, or an SLA with an 8L movement for <$2000. That would be my pick.

Completely understand your points. But the big size of the MM300 is a bit of a turn off for me, I'd prefer a more compact watch.

Btw, check out the SLA015, that was a MM300 with baton indices 😉

I personally expect Seiko to release a MM300 in the near future, that'll go down the design lines of the SLAs. That way, the 62MAS design is finally cemented into a proper non reissue line and the the MM300 can continue to exist beside it.

·

I own the SPB143. Lovely looking watch,

but I am sick and tired about it's accuracy .

I was wondering if the new marinemaster could do the trick of being beautiful (on my wrist) and showing me the correct time.

Image

I like most the dressy touch (suits my needs better then 100 extra meter)

·
norrecc

Completely understand your points. But the big size of the MM300 is a bit of a turn off for me, I'd prefer a more compact watch.

Btw, check out the SLA015, that was a MM300 with baton indices 😉

I personally expect Seiko to release a MM300 in the near future, that'll go down the design lines of the SLAs. That way, the 62MAS design is finally cemented into a proper non reissue line and the the MM300 can continue to exist beside it.

Have you tried the MM200 case? The 42mm case wears barely any bigger than an SKX. The L2L is 2mm longer, but the lugs curve down way more than the SKX. I have a smaller wrist than you and I can wear an SPB187/SPB383 just fine.

Fair enough, I didn't know the SLA015. To me that also looks like a frankenwatch, with 62MAS indices and sumo hands. 😂

·
AMerkmann

I own the SPB143. Lovely looking watch,

but I am sick and tired about it's accuracy .

I was wondering if the new marinemaster could do the trick of being beautiful (on my wrist) and showing me the correct time.

Image

I like most the dressy touch (suits my needs better then 100 extra meter)

The 6R is a very easy movement to regulate. Same old mechanism as its 7S/4R siblings.

If you don't have the tools to do so yourself, you can bring it to your local watchmaker and they should be able to regulate it within COSC margins in a few minutes. It could cost you anywhere between $20 and $100 depending where you live, but it's a hell of a lot cheaper than buying a new watch for accuracy reason.

·

Does it really matter about wether it’s limited, the name, reissue etc etc,? Do you like it does it speak to you, if yes then just get it & enjoy it.

I think it looks like a great dive watch & I like the “planking” effect on the dial, go for it.

·

I wasn't a fan until I saw it in person and it turned out to be a really beautifully sized and finished watch and a thoroughly modern take on the 62MAS; unlike the SBP "reinterpretations" this one struck me as what the 62MAS would look like if Seiko had continually evolved the design over the past 60 years as opposed to abandoning it and then reissuing it. I don't care for the dial texturing, but that's a personal taste thing and, knowing Seiko, several more dial variants are inevitable...

·

I also considered this one. I have both an MM200 and the SJE093. I can tell you they're different all together. The SJE093 is noticeably lighter and slimmer than any other Seiko I've owned.

If you want tight dims but still some good weight, go with an MM200. If you want a streamlined, light and capable diver, the SJE093 cannot be beat IMO. The new Marinemaster seems to be in between both of these. But I suggest trying one on first and compare it to modern SPB and SJE models if you can. Until you wear these things it's hard to tell which one you like.

Image
Image
·

I have a 6R in my KS and find it to be more accurate than my Hamilton's H-10 (2824), really upped their QC at least for KS, I wouldn't worry about the movement.

·
norrecc

Completely understand your points. But the big size of the MM300 is a bit of a turn off for me, I'd prefer a more compact watch.

Btw, check out the SLA015, that was a MM300 with baton indices 😉

I personally expect Seiko to release a MM300 in the near future, that'll go down the design lines of the SLAs. That way, the 62MAS design is finally cemented into a proper non reissue line and the the MM300 can continue to exist beside it.

Going to echo @Beanna here - the MM200 models sound like the answer then (and they're considerably cheaper than these SJE 62MAS versions). The SPB185/187 and GMT versions SPB381/383 are 42mm in diameter and 48.5mm L2L, but the lugs really hug the wrist. They're considerably thinner than the MM300 as well (even the GMT models are 2mm thinner at 13.4mm or so). Personal bias, but I've always preferred the MM cases to the 62MAS cases.

·

I sorta want to say it isn’t a Marinemaster, but instead I am going to say I think it is a solid watch from Seiko (putting my affinity for that name aside). I know some folks don’t like the 4:30 date, but I kinda like it as the dial just looks more symmetrical.

·

Prefer the look of the previous version, this one is too blingy for a tool watch, more for desk or boardroom diver than a diver.

·

Not my jam. I'm sure it's awesome, but my kind of awesome at that price point.

·
Matt_Kane

I had it on my wrist, it looks really really good. Go and check it out in person. Don't compare it to SJE093 though, it's not trying to be anything, it's it's own thing.

Will do!

·
hackmartian

I wasn't a fan until I saw it in person and it turned out to be a really beautifully sized and finished watch and a thoroughly modern take on the 62MAS; unlike the SBP "reinterpretations" this one struck me as what the 62MAS would look like if Seiko had continually evolved the design over the past 60 years as opposed to abandoning it and then reissuing it. I don't care for the dial texturing, but that's a personal taste thing and, knowing Seiko, several more dial variants are inevitable...

Exactly my thoughts, a nice evolution of the 62MAS design. It also fitting, that this would be in the upper tier of Seikos divers, imo.

Maybe I should wait for another dial texture, a glacier or matte black one would be cool

·
tonmed

I also considered this one. I have both an MM200 and the SJE093. I can tell you they're different all together. The SJE093 is noticeably lighter and slimmer than any other Seiko I've owned.

If you want tight dims but still some good weight, go with an MM200. If you want a streamlined, light and capable diver, the SJE093 cannot be beat IMO. The new Marinemaster seems to be in between both of these. But I suggest trying one on first and compare it to modern SPB and SJE models if you can. Until you wear these things it's hard to tell which one you like.

Image
Image

Yeah wearing them is what I'm afraid of, since there not that easy to get in hand (espoecially the SJE098). But thanks for your first hand experience!

I've had many of the SPBs in hand, and only really liked the SPB Baby-MM200 case, but ended up selling it, because I didn't wear it enough, due to its weight.

·
insane81

I have a 6R in my KS and find it to be more accurate than my Hamilton's H-10 (2824), really upped their QC at least for KS, I wouldn't worry about the movement.

Good to hear! I haven't had any issues with my 6Rs in the past, so I trust, that Seiko knows what they're doing. I've heard stories from all brands and movements about them breaking one week after purchase etc. I guess the millions of people with no problems won't go online to tell us about it 😂

·
mixitup

I sorta want to say it isn’t a Marinemaster, but instead I am going to say I think it is a solid watch from Seiko (putting my affinity for that name aside). I know some folks don’t like the 4:30 date, but I kinda like it as the dial just looks more symmetrical.

Yeah, the date seems to be a popular talking topic. I prefer a 6 o'clock date or a no-date, but the 4:30 is also fine if the date disk isn't white on a black dial.. I appreciate, that with a 4:30 date, none of the markers have to be removed 👍

·
Kevinseiko

Not my jam. I'm sure it's awesome, but my kind of awesome at that price point.

Yeah, I find the MSRP is way too high. Currently the SJE101 is going for 2500€ insstead of 3400€ new on Chrono24. For 2500€ it's no longer competing against Tudors etc, so it's a very different situation in my eyes. I really have to see it irl, because even 2500€ is a ton of money for a watch, can still buy you a used car 😂

·
MoonRabbit

Prefer the look of the previous version, this one is too blingy for a tool watch, more for desk or boardroom diver than a diver.

Yeah? Isn't the case brushed and the bezel insert steel? I'd consider a polished case and a ceramic bezel insert a requirement for maximum bling... But maybe the bezel edge makes it bling a bit more

·
norrecc

Yeah? Isn't the case brushed and the bezel insert steel? I'd consider a polished case and a ceramic bezel insert a requirement for maximum bling... But maybe the bezel edge makes it bling a bit more

The SJE101 is quite blingy. It's a modern "diver", the design reflects that. It's obviously meant for desk diving. The surface finish is very well done, there are a lot of different surfaces, angles finished differently, etc. I also liked the bracelet, it looks very good, fits the watch and feels quality. I had the SJE101 as a direct comparison to Longines Legend Diver and the surface finish on the SJE looked and felt better to me. But that may be because Longines aims to be a bit more under the radar and it's meant to be like that. Compared to the LLD, the SJE101 looks way more blingy.

·

I'm a big fan of the MM300 line, the sbdx and SLA models... I owned most of the models over the past 10 years and still own 2 SLA...

This new edition looks like a 62MAS...

Every cues that made the previous generations the grail for many, is simply gone at the exception of the MM writing on the dial.

Monoblock case, sexy lines hiding its size, dial depth, round chunky markers, mm hands, curved crystal from inside , thick bezel for instant grip, crown at 4, insane lume, and so many other stuffs...

Don't get me wrong I'm sure it's a nice watch, but the MM DNA is simply missing.

Hopefully the following editions will be more in line with the legendary MM300.

Image
Image
·
norrecc

Yeah? Isn't the case brushed and the bezel insert steel? I'd consider a polished case and a ceramic bezel insert a requirement for maximum bling... But maybe the bezel edge makes it bling a bit more

The centre link bracelet is polished, I think Seiko wants to be comparable to the swiss diver as omega aqua terra and others in term of elegant divers, to justify the price tag to be seemed way less than the swiss but comparable in the look.

·
Alexxxx

I'm a big fan of the MM300 line, the sbdx and SLA models... I owned most of the models over the past 10 years and still own 2 SLA...

This new edition looks like a 62MAS...

Every cues that made the previous generations the grail for many, is simply gone at the exception of the MM writing on the dial.

Monoblock case, sexy lines hiding its size, dial depth, round chunky markers, mm hands, curved crystal from inside , thick bezel for instant grip, crown at 4, insane lume, and so many other stuffs...

Don't get me wrong I'm sure it's a nice watch, but the MM DNA is simply missing.

Hopefully the following editions will be more in line with the legendary MM300.

Image
Image

These 2 are unapologetic divers that wears proud over a wet suit, not cowarding under the cuffs. Great watches, wear them proud, there are beauties out there for under the cuffs, not a diver.

·
MoonRabbit

The centre link bracelet is polished, I think Seiko wants to be comparable to the swiss diver as omega aqua terra and others in term of elegant divers, to justify the price tag to be seemed way less than the swiss but comparable in the look.

I really want to see one in person... To me the SPBs always seemed a bit rough around the edges (especially the hands), had awesome cases, a mediocre movement, mediocre alignment and mediocre bracelets. If these topics are all improved, I'd consider the price of 2,5k grey market quite "okay".

I'll bring my Aqua Terra when I try it on, to compare 😉

·
Matt_Kane

I had it on my wrist, it looks really really good. Go and check it out in person. Don't compare it to SJE093 though, it's not trying to be anything, it's it's own thing.

Oh boy, had a look at a Marinemaster today... This watch is awesome!

Image

definizely on my shortlist now....

also compared it to some SPBs.... night and day

Image
·
norrecc

Oh boy, had a look at a Marinemaster today... This watch is awesome!

Image

definizely on my shortlist now....

also compared it to some SPBs.... night and day

Image

Told ya. 😁

I've seen it in February and I still think about it. It's a lot of money though (3,5k€ here)

I've seen Longines legend diver on that same day and I don't think about that 😅

·
Matt_Kane

Told ya. 😁

I've seen it in February and I still think about it. It's a lot of money though (3,5k€ here)

I've seen Longines legend diver on that same day and I don't think about that 😅

Yeah, we'll see how long I can hold out... My AD offered it to me for 3k flat, but I'll try and get a little something for my wife included in that price 😜

·
norrecc

Yeah, we'll see how long I can hold out... My AD offered it to me for 3k flat, but I'll try and get a little something for my wife included in that price 😜

Fingers crossed.