I time lots of things with my chrono (mostly wait times for restaurants and (quietly just for me) my wife when we she is getting ready. I would say date window is more useful but at my age, I can’t read the date without a cyclops. The cyclops is another (beloved?) Rolex innovation.
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
Wearing my vote today
Neither? 😅
E: No Complications (a fuss free dial) ✔
E: No Complications (a fuss free dial) ✔
Seconded!
Do do any of those. Time only 3 hands is all I need & want. Especially hate date complications!
I’ve had speedmasters for 25 years and never once timed anything
GMT is useless to me so I’ve got 2
Never had a moon phase but that might change. I tried on a speedmaster moonphase and I did like that. I probably wouldn’t keep it up to date though
At my age with my eyes the date window is basically useless to me
The one I use often is the timing bezel. I time my breaks in work every day I’m in work
C. Moonphase
I guess date window, I am into three hand watches at the moment and I do notice the absence of a date at times. lol
I have all of those but prefer time only watches for general wear.
I time lots of things with my chrono (mostly wait times for restaurants and (quietly just for me) my wife when we she is getting ready. I would say date window is more useful but at my age, I can’t read the date without a cyclops. The cyclops is another (beloved?) Rolex innovation.
I’m super ok with none. Though I accept others from time to time.
None of the above. In most cases I prefer a simple three hander.
No complication please.