Less is more
9 comments
Sort by
Simon Miles
Photographer and watch enthusiast. Vintage style. Classic sizing. Less is more.
Okehampton, UK
Member since
Last active: 3 months ago
6.90” / 17.53 cm
Nice pairing!
Must admit the automatic has always appealed to me more than that manual wind business. Cool watch mate 😍👍
This is the one I would get too as it'll wear better at 39mm.
Absolutely agree 👌it’s an elegant yet sporty watch which is versatile in many situations
Great watch ❤️
Exactly
This is the one I would get too as it'll wear better at 39mm.
It really wears more like a 36-37mm. The bezel diameter is right about 36mm on these watches. 35.5mm if I'm not mistaken. The added diameter in Omegas measurements comes from the extended case on the crown side of the watch. It definitely wears small, but is a great experience on the wrist.
It really wears more like a 36-37mm. The bezel diameter is right about 36mm on these watches. 35.5mm if I'm not mistaken. The added diameter in Omegas measurements comes from the extended case on the crown side of the watch. It definitely wears small, but is a great experience on the wrist.
To me it wears like a 38mm. Spot on about the bezel, but the asymmetric case still adds a little more heft and you do feel this on the wrist. I agree it's small for a chrono. Feels old school to me because of this. Actually, makes a brilliant dress(ier) watch.
To me it wears like a 38mm. Spot on about the bezel, but the asymmetric case still adds a little more heft and you do feel this on the wrist. I agree it's small for a chrono. Feels old school to me because of this. Actually, makes a brilliant dress(ier) watch.
Yeah, it's a beautiful watch and a bit more elegant because of the smaller size. Sizes can certainly be misleading, but I felt like the Reduced wore pretty similar to my first gen AT and my SBGW231 which are 36.25mm and 37.3mm respectively. Just goes to show how we all perceive sizing a bit differently from one person to the next.