Nope, I hack the seconds at 60, and then set the time to the nearest minute. Ie. If it's 13:23:20 I set my hacked watch to 13:24 and wait until the time catches up.
Well... these days I hack at 60, then set the watch to the nearest minute, and start it however early it is... a few seconds here or there isn't that important.
I do that, move the minute hand past the desired time and then dial it back to set. I thought it was supposed to be good practice (can’t remember where I saw that though)
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
Nope, I hack the seconds at 60, and then set the time to the nearest minute. Ie. If it's 13:23:20 I set my hacked watch to 13:24 and wait until the time catches up.
Well... these days I hack at 60, then set the watch to the nearest minute, and start it however early it is... a few seconds here or there isn't that important.
Not consciously, no
I do that, move the minute hand past the desired time and then dial it back to set. I thought it was supposed to be good practice (can’t remember where I saw that though)
I've read that that going clockwise past and counter-clockwise back to time supposedly gets rid of "gear slack"...
No, but there are times when I've been affected by the mysterious " 5 minutes off" gremlin, only noticed long after I set the watch.
Kind of like the "my quartz watch id dead" gremlin where you swear the hand isn't ticking-and then it ticks.