That is a stunning watch. If I am not mistaken that is from the 1950s correct? It looks brand new on the pictures.
Its 1963 actually. Condition is very good for the age, thats true 🙏just the hands are starting to lose the tritium 🥲but i love it, just a very Special piece 😍
Its 1963 actually. Condition is very good for the age, thats true 🙏just the hands are starting to lose the tritium 🥲but i love it, just a very Special piece 😍
It looks fantastic, no doubt a bit it. There is just something about a well cared for vintage watch.
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
Perfect.
That is a stunning watch. If I am not mistaken that is from the 1950s correct? It looks brand new on the pictures.
Yup, stunning.
That is a stunning watch. If I am not mistaken that is from the 1950s correct? It looks brand new on the pictures.
Its 1963 actually. Condition is very good for the age, thats true 🙏just the hands are starting to lose the tritium 🥲but i love it, just a very Special piece 😍
Its 1963 actually. Condition is very good for the age, thats true 🙏just the hands are starting to lose the tritium 🥲but i love it, just a very Special piece 😍
It looks fantastic, no doubt a bit it. There is just something about a well cared for vintage watch.