Some of you may recall me wearing this watch during the first week of Aurelian's one-watch-challenge. Comments such as "horological smudge" and "piece of coal on a strap" accompanied this particular beast. Admittedly, there were prettier watches in the running.
The Evoque is indeed a big beast: 47.5mm dial diameter is too big for most wrists, and my skinny 17cm wrist should be no exception. Surprisingly, that was not a big problem. The lack of a crown is part of the reason why. At 54mm lug-to-lug, instead of forming a big tent that could provide shelter for an ant colony during a thunderstorm, the nylon strap pulls instead the case down that even a single ant would complain about the lack of private space underneath it.
What has the watch overall to offer? It is a solar-powered quartz, with the kind of functions you may find on a typical digital Casio, e.g. basic chronograph features, 48 time zones, a timer, even a compass. In this regard, it seems to occupy a unique place in the market. I was specifically looking for the timer - and indeed this watch did time on more than one occasion my cooking (well, my ready-meals).
Negatives?
There are some small issues:
There is also a big issue: the dial. This is an orgy of grey and black, dominated by the solar cells. North Edge almost turned this into a feature for the background, but the hour and minute indicators hover above the ocean of grey only as an afterthought. The digital LCD display offers more grey on black and is only readable if favourable light and angle conditions are met. There are two shortish analogue hands, appearing black on grey, partially camouflaged by their skeletelisation. There is no seconds hand, but the minute hand moves ever so slightly every 10 seconds. The white tips of the hands keeps the time just about readable.
I paid £48 on AliExpress, though this seems to sell well, and its price has climbed since. Finding a solar watch with so many features is hard, and below £100 this is probably your only option.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the authentic presence for this person or brand.
Tough, but fair.
That is a bit of an eyesore, and the functionality sounds horrible! You know, Casio does offer an alternative to this watch for less than $50.
Here is a link to the watch on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00791R1MI/ref=sspa_dk_detail_2?pd_rd_i=B00791R1MI&pd_rd_w=zxiZz&content-id=amzn1.sym.d533dd31-f352-432f-87d0-ace6fec162b4&pf_rd_p=d533dd31-f352-432f-87d0-ace6fec162b4&pf_rd_r=RSE9BTWMWVB0S3B1V7YW&pd_rd_wg=11Gde&pd_rd_r=f80d33ee-db02-4d69-833f-899418f73e70&s=watches&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUEzOTBPSVMyN0xaS1NYJmVuY3J5cHRlZElkPUEwODU0ODE3UzlGTTRQR1pRUUVMJmVuY3J5cHRlZEFkSWQ9QTA1NTM1OTBaUUFFMkNLS1FGQU4md2lkZ2V0TmFtZT1zcF9kZXRhaWxfdGhlbWF0aWMmYWN0aW9uPWNsaWNrUmVkaXJlY3QmZG9Ob3RMb2dDbGljaz10cnVl&th=1
Good review. Everything we needed to know about the watch!
That is a bit of an eyesore, and the functionality sounds horrible! You know, Casio does offer an alternative to this watch for less than $50.
Here is a link to the watch on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00791R1MI/ref=sspa_dk_detail_2?pd_rd_i=B00791R1MI&pd_rd_w=zxiZz&content-id=amzn1.sym.d533dd31-f352-432f-87d0-ace6fec162b4&pf_rd_p=d533dd31-f352-432f-87d0-ace6fec162b4&pf_rd_r=RSE9BTWMWVB0S3B1V7YW&pd_rd_wg=11Gde&pd_rd_r=f80d33ee-db02-4d69-833f-899418f73e70&s=watches&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUEzOTBPSVMyN0xaS1NYJmVuY3J5cHRlZElkPUEwODU0ODE3UzlGTTRQR1pRUUVMJmVuY3J5cHRlZEFkSWQ9QTA1NTM1OTBaUUFFMkNLS1FGQU4md2lkZ2V0TmFtZT1zcF9kZXRhaWxfdGhlbWF0aWMmYWN0aW9uPWNsaWNrUmVkaXJlY3QmZG9Ob3RMb2dDbGljaz10cnVl&th=1
Thanks, that's passed me by - but that is also a 47mm watch, and another design only the designer's mum can love. If one stretches the budget to £100, there are some solar G-shocks that look more attractive, and the smallest I've seen is still 43.2 and thicker than the Evoque.
I'm coming to the conclusion that multi-functional solar watches is perhaps not the way to go. One way or the other you get a huge lump on the wrist.
I'll probably get myself a digital (non-solar) quartz for these extra functions; perhaps a Lorus, as I'm not a big fan of Casio designs.
It is over $100, usually running between $110 and $120, but Casio does offer an alternative that is smaller in size. It's the Casio LCW-M300D-1AJF.
That is a bit of an eyesore, and the functionality sounds horrible! You know, Casio does offer an alternative to this watch for less than $50.
Here is a link to the watch on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00791R1MI/ref=sspa_dk_detail_2?pd_rd_i=B00791R1MI&pd_rd_w=zxiZz&content-id=amzn1.sym.d533dd31-f352-432f-87d0-ace6fec162b4&pf_rd_p=d533dd31-f352-432f-87d0-ace6fec162b4&pf_rd_r=RSE9BTWMWVB0S3B1V7YW&pd_rd_wg=11Gde&pd_rd_r=f80d33ee-db02-4d69-833f-899418f73e70&s=watches&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUEzOTBPSVMyN0xaS1NYJmVuY3J5cHRlZElkPUEwODU0ODE3UzlGTTRQR1pRUUVMJmVuY3J5cHRlZEFkSWQ9QTA1NTM1OTBaUUFFMkNLS1FGQU4md2lkZ2V0TmFtZT1zcF9kZXRhaWxfdGhlbWF0aWMmYWN0aW9uPWNsaWNrUmVkaXJlY3QmZG9Ob3RMb2dDbGljaz10cnVl&th=1
have that watch but I'm not really comfortable with the strap lol