Just never a fan of vintage watches, guess I am just not hardcore enough (or rich enough) to get into what I consider the "next level" of watch collecting where even the most seasoned experts gets shafted all the time. The service history and origins are always in question and really no one can prove anything. So I will stay in the safe waters of new or newer watches where it's easier to be "assured".
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
Both designs are nice. Personally, I’ve always preferred vintage styles divers👍🏻
Both designs are nice. Personally, I’ve always preferred vintage styles divers👍🏻
Me too. I used to favour the 14060 but the older 5513s have a vintage charm to them that seems more and more irresistible.
Just never a fan of vintage watches, guess I am just not hardcore enough (or rich enough) to get into what I consider the "next level" of watch collecting where even the most seasoned experts gets shafted all the time. The service history and origins are always in question and really no one can prove anything. So I will stay in the safe waters of new or newer watches where it's easier to be "assured".
There isn't a loser in this one. Personal preference, I am all for 2 lines and tritium on the dial.
Give me the more modern of these two though I really prefer the 6 digit. Plus I want a date
5513, but (hot take!) I think I prefer the 4-line 14060 to both…
Prefer the looks of the 5513 with its maxi dial and matte finish but prefer the relatively more modern build of the 14060.
Undersized indices bother me, and it's a thing Rolex see so to do a lot. The 5513 wins for that reason.