Glycine X Invicta
I like both companies, but this was unnecessary. I know they trying to match what Swatch and Omega did two years ago. I hate those collaborations.
Other than that, I think this is a very good looking watch. But the two names ruined this watch. Maybe people will buy them. I wont.
Good for whoever decided to make this watch.
4 comments
Sort by
Casioman
I’m a NYC bus operator. I’ve been into watches since i was a teenager. I love the Casio brand and lately into Invictas. Working my way up to Tag Hueer and Rolex. 👍
Mt Vernon, NY, USA
Member since
Last active: 3 days ago
17.78 cm
Well at least it took 7 years before Eyal began the ruination of the Glycine brand.
It was a good 7 years. Hopefully this is a one time intrusion on a great brand and not a sign of things to come.
In the early 1960's Glycine had its name and that of Altus on watches to show that the companies had integrated. It did not dilute Glycine, but Altus soon disappeared from memory.
Glycine has value. If a struggling parent company had to sell an asset, that looks to be the asset to sell. I am more bullish on Glycine than Invicta in the next decade.
This watch will be memory holed. It isn't bad or good enough to be remembered.
Yeah and I’m sure it’s the exact weight and size of a manhole cover, too.
Sorry, but I find it grotesque.