I think Tudor does Bronze the best, so if you want a bronze watch (disagree it’s a fad, been around too long for that) and you don’t want to go too heavy into a single brand, then I’d say keep the bronze as the best version of that you can get, then get alternatives for the others (like a railmaster and explorer 2).
If you are collecting the brand with some hope of owning a watch that might be interesting in the future, the brown dial bronze case BB is my personal choice. The 54, and Pro are nice but too popular. When the brand returned to Canada and America, I was smittened bought too many but do not regret owning the bronze,ceramic and the NF.
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
Depends how much you love bronze, I guess.. but the '54 is a sweet compact one.
D, Ranger or a North Flag 😉
Bronze is a fad so it's out. I love a BB Pro
I think Tudor does Bronze the best, so if you want a bronze watch (disagree it’s a fad, been around too long for that) and you don’t want to go too heavy into a single brand, then I’d say keep the bronze as the best version of that you can get, then get alternatives for the others (like a railmaster and explorer 2).
If you are collecting the brand with some hope of owning a watch that might be interesting in the future, the brown dial bronze case BB is my personal choice. The 54, and Pro are nice but too popular. When the brand returned to Canada and America, I was smittened bought too many but do not regret owning the bronze,ceramic and the NF.