I’m not a big guy. I‘ve bought many watches at 42mm over the years and I’ve always felt my wrists disappeared below the slab of watch on it. Girth (ci...
commented onSmall wrists, small watch, no worries·
Thanks for the info - I’ll keep it in mind when referring to my own wrist size in future. I’m still rather sceptical on how solid that data is - and like another famously debated ‘average’ size, I wonder if there’s an element of reporting bias.
At the end of the day, I’m still happy to call it small in the hopes of people seeing it in real life and saying ‘ Oh it’s bigger than I thought’.
I think we’re all coming to the realisation that the perfect watch doesn’t exist (mostly, and within reason). I think the tipping point is finding a watch with flaws that aren’t exactly deal breakers that you can put up with until eventually you no longer see them, or you can see past them.
Alternatively, you continue to see them and nothing else about the watch. And then you flip it.
Also - the SPB143 - the thickness of the bezel burnt the deal for me. Following the more vintage proportions would have been an instant deal but instead it looks a little too far removed for me.
That being said I bought it anyway and sold it after a month.
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.