I would have to say the Citizen Promaster diver in Titanium, re-release of their original challenge diver. Just on form and function, and a different case material.
It’s an interesting topic, especially the difference between vintage and antique, makes sense, learned something new there. Never thought too much about this, however I suppose I have always naturally thought a watch is vintage when it is 20 ish years old, that being the physical item itself. I feel some confusion can arise when looking at vintage and vintage inspired watches. The F91-W, I would call it retro design, or just the iconic F91-W. I’m interested, as it was of that late 80s time and still is today unchanged in its original form, and is the same brand (can It be classed as vintage inspired off your own design) does this watch get a pass on the vintage inspired label?…and does this then class this watch as a timeless design, just like a Speedmaster or Submariner. It has transcended generations just like those designs. I don’t know, now I am confused about vintage inspired/timeless design. I can see why the 20 years rule was put in place for a vintage watch this can give you a headache.
Two iconic watches! Santos for me! I prefer the design, more versatile than the Tank, with the Tank having more of a dressier look. Still elegant and sophisticated, yet retains its industrial tool watch looks, harkening back to its early aviation roots. Winner!
Yes I think there is a few ways to look at it. What fits the modern day bill. What would he wear if he was a real person. What brand would you just love to see him wear.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the authentic presence for this person or brand.