I know lots of people in this forum are keen photographers. I’ve read an excellent post from kentuckyman30 about his Fuji which I’m tempted by but I wanted a camera that can take really good close up macro. Anyone have any recommendations or thoughts please. Budget around $1k
A lot of cameras can take great macro shots, it's the lens that makes all the difference. I've heard that Fujis have great colours and I've been tempted to pick up an Xt-1 for street photography. I'm currently running a 5D and Olympus OMD system. You could potentially go with a mirrorless, such as one of the canon R series with the ef-m mount. Do a bit of research on lenses, the glass makes all the difference, less so the camera itself, provided that it has the features you need.
Whichever system you're interested in, fuji, Nikon, canon, Sony, om-system, Leica, whatever, just make sure the glass you need is available for the mount system. Adapters are also available, to adapt EF to EF-M for example.
Whichever system you're interested in, fuji, Nikon, canon, Sony, om-system, Leica, whatever, just make sure the glass you need is available for the mount system. Adapters are also available, to adapt EF to EF-M for example.
I’ve been told the same thing thank you! Do you if the Xt-1 is any good for macro?
I highly recommend doing some more research on the best systems, or at least what would work best for you. There's probably better options than the fuji, but that camera is stuck in my head currently lol.
Check out Mark Holtz on YouTube. He does lots with vintage stuff. Basically with any mirror less you can get an adapter and then use a vintage lens which is way cheaper. Cameras like Sony have focus peaking and other features which makes this really easy. Even if you got an older iteration Sony A7 and do this I think you'd be happy. I have been using Sony for years, mainly for landscapes, but have done some watch photography now using Laowa lenses, which are an upgrade I'd say from a vintage but not really needed.
This is also coming from a Fuji XT30 & X100t owner. I bought them really because they're smaller, lighter, and makes me slow down more to take photos. Overall tho, Sony is much easier to do macro with and is workhouse for landscape as well.
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
A lot of cameras can take great macro shots, it's the lens that makes all the difference. I've heard that Fujis have great colours and I've been tempted to pick up an Xt-1 for street photography. I'm currently running a 5D and Olympus OMD system. You could potentially go with a mirrorless, such as one of the canon R series with the ef-m mount. Do a bit of research on lenses, the glass makes all the difference, less so the camera itself, provided that it has the features you need.
Whichever system you're interested in, fuji, Nikon, canon, Sony, om-system, Leica, whatever, just make sure the glass you need is available for the mount system. Adapters are also available, to adapt EF to EF-M for example.
Whichever system you're interested in, fuji, Nikon, canon, Sony, om-system, Leica, whatever, just make sure the glass you need is available for the mount system. Adapters are also available, to adapt EF to EF-M for example.
I’ve been told the same thing thank you! Do you if the Xt-1 is any good for macro?
It uses the X mount system, so theres a fair amount of lenses available.
The camera itself has decent resolution, 16mp if I remember correctly and the X-trans sensor.
Here's a lens I've heard good reviews about, though I have not used personally:
https://www.henrys.com/laowa-65mm-f2-8-2x-macro-fuji-x-lens/5637214237.p?color=Black&size=FUJI+X&style=New&gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjw48-vBhBbEiwAzqrZVOqnfmqbDf2G8bo0_ssbd94Lb0wlLXoMViAbAWP_LwbwQI3PhI_6ohoCXawQAvD_BwE
This is a fully manual lens by the way.
https://www.digitalcameraworld.com/buying-guides/best-macro-lenses
It uses the X mount system, so theres a fair amount of lenses available.
The camera itself has decent resolution, 16mp if I remember correctly and the X-trans sensor.
Here's a lens I've heard good reviews about, though I have not used personally:
https://www.henrys.com/laowa-65mm-f2-8-2x-macro-fuji-x-lens/5637214237.p?color=Black&size=FUJI+X&style=New&gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjw48-vBhBbEiwAzqrZVOqnfmqbDf2G8bo0_ssbd94Lb0wlLXoMViAbAWP_LwbwQI3PhI_6ohoCXawQAvD_BwE
This is a fully manual lens by the way.
Thank you so much!!
Thank you so much!!
No problem, hopefully that helps a bit.
I highly recommend doing some more research on the best systems, or at least what would work best for you. There's probably better options than the fuji, but that camera is stuck in my head currently lol.
This lives in my bench at work with a set of micro filter lens. Just incase I see something cool I want to photograph.
Check out Mark Holtz on YouTube. He does lots with vintage stuff. Basically with any mirror less you can get an adapter and then use a vintage lens which is way cheaper. Cameras like Sony have focus peaking and other features which makes this really easy. Even if you got an older iteration Sony A7 and do this I think you'd be happy. I have been using Sony for years, mainly for landscapes, but have done some watch photography now using Laowa lenses, which are an upgrade I'd say from a vintage but not really needed.
This is also coming from a Fuji XT30 & X100t owner. I bought them really because they're smaller, lighter, and makes me slow down more to take photos. Overall tho, Sony is much easier to do macro with and is workhouse for landscape as well.
https://youtu.be/hRnKYkiE9cE?si=gypPUIc_J3r5Bw0a
This lives in my bench at work with a set of micro filter lens. Just incase I see something cool I want to photograph.
That looks solid!!