I'm back and forth between these 2 movements for my speedy. I love the look of the 321, but wonder why wouldn't I go for the more advanced movement? Help me compare, and contrast these...
I had both and the 3861 is a much better caliber in all its dimensions, mainly technological. Regarding the watch itself, I never managed to connect with the Ed White, it didn't feel like a Speedmaster Professional despite being its genesis. I finally ended up selling it and buying the new sapphire moonwatch with caliber 3861, which I love. I hope my experience is useful to you, greetings.
I had both and the 3861 is a much better caliber in all its dimensions, mainly technological. Regarding the watch itself, I never managed to connect with the Ed White, it didn't feel like a Speedmaster Professional despite being its genesis. I finally ended up selling it and buying the new sapphire moonwatch with caliber 3861, which I love. I hope my experience is useful to you, greetings.
I had a pre-moon 105012 for many years. If I were to buy another Speedy (I won't) it would be the same reference. 321 has the history, I'm not interested in the 3861.
I had a pre-moon 105012 for many years. If I were to buy another Speedy (I won't) it would be the same reference. 321 has the history, I'm not interested in the 3861.
Depends on what you’re looking for. I buy based on the (perhaps faulty) assumption that I’ll keep the watch for years/decades. Given that, I’ll take the most bulletproof watch/movement I can—so it’s the 3861 for me.
I have 3861 version but if given the free choice I would go with 321 any day despite technicaly/specs wise inferior. Main reasons are it is more beautiful, has significant historical meaning, how and where it is made/assembled and is column wheel movement. That is only for the movement, I also prefer the 321 watch as such more than modern version Speedy. But the price gap is significant, hence ( currently ) owning the 3861
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
I had both and the 3861 is a much better caliber in all its dimensions, mainly technological. Regarding the watch itself, I never managed to connect with the Ed White, it didn't feel like a Speedmaster Professional despite being its genesis. I finally ended up selling it and buying the new sapphire moonwatch with caliber 3861, which I love. I hope my experience is useful to you, greetings.
https://www.watchcrunch.com/timestamp/posts/wruw-2023-11-14-aa23f485-urcle4ug-249670
I had both and the 3861 is a much better caliber in all its dimensions, mainly technological. Regarding the watch itself, I never managed to connect with the Ed White, it didn't feel like a Speedmaster Professional despite being its genesis. I finally ended up selling it and buying the new sapphire moonwatch with caliber 3861, which I love. I hope my experience is useful to you, greetings.
https://www.watchcrunch.com/timestamp/posts/wruw-2023-11-14-aa23f485-urcle4ug-249670
I appreciate that perspective... Thank You!
I had a pre-moon 105012 for many years. If I were to buy another Speedy (I won't) it would be the same reference. 321 has the history, I'm not interested in the 3861.
I had a pre-moon 105012 for many years. If I were to buy another Speedy (I won't) it would be the same reference. 321 has the history, I'm not interested in the 3861.
thanks for the perspective...
Depends on what you’re looking for. I buy based on the (perhaps faulty) assumption that I’ll keep the watch for years/decades. Given that, I’ll take the most bulletproof watch/movement I can—so it’s the 3861 for me.
3861 is better specced. 321 is hand assembled and more prestigious. But i think i'd rather have specs over prestige ☺️
I think the 3861 shows off a little dimension
I have 3861 version but if given the free choice I would go with 321 any day despite technicaly/specs wise inferior. Main reasons are it is more beautiful, has significant historical meaning, how and where it is made/assembled and is column wheel movement. That is only for the movement, I also prefer the 321 watch as such more than modern version Speedy. But the price gap is significant, hence ( currently ) owning the 3861