Omega Speedmaster Reduced Review

Omega’s Speedmaster is a classic. It was the watch that was worn to the moon by the Apollo Astronauts, and its design was years ahead of its time. Its large (for the time) 42mm case means it still finds favour with watch collectors today. This rich heritage keeps prices in the used market high, but there are alternatives for those who cannot stretch to the price of a Moonwatch. The Omega Speedmaster Reduced was created in the 1990s and offers the look of the full-size Speedie but with a 38mm case size and a self-winding movement.

Image

 

A Week on the Wrist – Omega Speedmaster Reduced

Image

The Speedmaster Reduced reference 3510.50 costs less than half the price of a “full size” hand-wound Speedmaster Moonwatch but – at least from a distance – looks much the same. Closer inspection reveals some differences: the case is smaller at 38mm, the bracelet has been reduced to 19mm and has polished mid-links, and the sub-dials are further apart and the running seconds hand and elapsed minutes counter have switched places. The Speedmaster Reduced also has numbers on the dial, whereas the Moonwatch does not. Look from the side and the most obvious difference becomes apparent: the movement is a “piggy-back chronograph” which means that the pushers and crown are out of line with one another.

What is a Piggyback Chronograph?

The Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch has a hand-wound Lemania based chronograph movement. The Speedmaster Reduced has an automatic movement, which is based on the ETA 2890-A2. Omega’s version is branded as the calibre 3220. As the base is only a “three hand” movement, to add a stopwatch feature, Omega added on a Dubois-Dépraz 2020 chronograph module on top. As a result, the watch has 42 jewels. It effectively is two separate movements stacked on top of one another. Amongst the benefits of this arrangement are that it is cheaper and slimmer than a dedicated chronograph such as the ETA 7750. The disadvantage is that such an arrangement is expensive – some say impossible – to service. Many watch enthusiasts believe a piggyback chronograph is unreliable. Often, when it comes to service time, the chronograph element is simply removed and replaced: and that can be costly!

Image

 

Overall Thoughts on the Omega Speedmaster Reduced

Overall, we liked the look of this watch, but could not get past the misaligned chrono pushers. The size is actually not as much of a barrier as we expected, it wears very comfortably. The lack of a date function made it incompatible with an office job and it ended up spending more time in its box than on the wrist.

Omega Speedmaster Reduced Review

4.8
Yes No
5/5
5/5
4/5
5/5
5/5
  • It looks very much like the classic Moonwatch but at a more affordable price
  • An automatic movement is handy compared to a manual winding watch
  • The 38mm size fits under a shirt sleeve well
  • The acrylic crystal looks cool, but scratches easily
  • The piggyback chronograph makes the pushers and crown look off from the side
  • The caseback is a “pop off” type, so the watch has no water resistance whatsoever
Reply
·

I love this watch.  I owned it briefly and then sold it to fund another watch purchase......I missed it and ended up purchasing a 3539.50...which was the last variant of the Speedy Reduced. These last 3539 versions came with sapphire crystals, no numbers on inner dial at hash marks, improved water resistance, a modern bracelet/clasp and my favorite....they had the cock and ballz at 12:00.

I've thrown mine on an Uncle Seiko Holzer bracelet and this reduced has become one of my favorites in the collection....my only chronograph, and probably my last. Anyone with a sub 7inch wrist should seriously consider this piece....especially if you're into swapping out the bracelet for leather/canvas straps. Its an amazing watch.

Great Review.....thank you.

·

Excellent review of this beautiful Omega - belated thanks! 🤙❤️🤙

·

I have seen comments before that the Speedmaster Reduced movement gets replaced instead of serviced - does anyone have first hand experience of this?