I am curious as to the "strategy" thinking behind the Moonswatch and Swatch Fathoms. Yes, it is to target a specific audience, but very unlikely the purists who can afford the real deal (the Omegas, Blancpains), and may not really be the younger, likely more fashionable, Swatch crowd who may not necessarily gravitate towards the nostalgic designs of watches. Perhaps the colours are to somewhat make up for that and hopefully bring the younger crowd across the line to start enjoying (buying) the established names when their income levels increase with age/success. Does make you wonder what the next collaboration will be.
I wonder if the move to to release such watches/collaborations is also partly to move the attention away from microbrands and, more likely, replicas and fakes. Although fakes are almost always to swindle someone, there are those who consider buying fakes (and replicas) that may now re-consider spending similar money on a swatch collaboration instead, which even with a "throwaway" approach, may be a better value proposition than fakes/replicas, as some are priced quite highly, despite being cheaper than the real thing.
Or are microbrands becoming a threat to established names with their ever-improving quality and designs, and much wider colour spectrum such that most watch enthusiasts have the option to buy multiple colour versions of the same/similar watch from a microbrand that it is starting to eat into the money that flows to the established brands? Watch collarborations at this price point certainly allows for the microbrand market players to reconsider their purchasing decision when they can now afford to have a brand name and multiple colour versions of it without breaking the bank.
Anyway, just my thoughts on the recent developments. An interesting time for the watch market, almost like the quartz vs. mechanical period with a sudden influx of microbrands (due in part to internet funding platforms supporting their development).