Left column shows the orientation of the watch when it was tested. Next column over shows the deviation per day. Next column shows amplitude of the escapement. And last column shows beat error. The two rows under the line are Delta on top (difference between highest and lowest), and the X must be the overall average. Looks like your watch could use a servicing, the amplitude is kind of low.
Left column shows the orientation of the watch when it was tested. Next column over shows the deviation per day. Next column shows amplitude of the escapement. And last column shows beat error. The two rows under the line are Delta on top (difference between highest and lowest), and the X must be the overall average. Looks like your watch could use a servicing, the amplitude is kind of low.
They are fully serviced, disassembled, checked all parts, new oil applied, reassembled and replaced the spring that pushes on the pinion where the second hand is because the second hand was jumping like 2.5hz ๐
Someone much smarter than me will come along and explain it much better. But it's just a report of your time graphing results.
The little symbols on the left are the position of the watch. Facing up, facing down, left, right, ECT.
The numbers next to them to the right are the seconds per day variance your watch is experiencing. It looks like you're watching might be running a smidge fast but within decent parameters.
The next set of numbers are your amplitude. It measures how well your balance wheel is working.
From the condition of your watch I'd say it's vintage. I'm no expert but those look like good numbers for a vintage watch.
Yes, they are vintage. They are from year 1969 to 1972 ๐
Positional variance looks good, +8 seconds per day average. Amplitude (how far balance wheel moves) looks a bit low, but I'm not familiar with older watches, & may be normal, as is the 51ยฐ lift angle ๐๐ป
They are fully serviced, disassembled, checked all parts, new oil applied, reassembled and replaced the spring that pushes on the pinion where the second hand is because the second hand was jumping like 2.5hz ๐
I know modern watches, you're looking for a high amplitude, but for a vintage watch like this one, this amplitude is probably fine. Especially since it was just serviced! The accuracy looks just fine, and it's a really nice looking watch.
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in ourย Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
Left column shows the orientation of the watch when it was tested. Next column over shows the deviation per day. Next column shows amplitude of the escapement. And last column shows beat error. The two rows under the line are Delta on top (difference between highest and lowest), and the X must be the overall average. Looks like your watch could use a servicing, the amplitude is kind of low.
Left column shows the orientation of the watch when it was tested. Next column over shows the deviation per day. Next column shows amplitude of the escapement. And last column shows beat error. The two rows under the line are Delta on top (difference between highest and lowest), and the X must be the overall average. Looks like your watch could use a servicing, the amplitude is kind of low.
They are fully serviced, disassembled, checked all parts, new oil applied, reassembled and replaced the spring that pushes on the pinion where the second hand is because the second hand was jumping like 2.5hz ๐
Someone much smarter than me will come along and explain it much better. But it's just a report of your time graphing results.
The little symbols on the left are the position of the watch. Facing up, facing down, left, right, ECT.
The numbers next to them to the right are the seconds per day variance your watch is experiencing. It looks like you're watching might be running a smidge fast but within decent parameters.
The next set of numbers are your amplitude. It measures how well your balance wheel is working.
From the condition of your watch I'd say it's vintage. I'm no expert but those look like good numbers for a vintage watch.
Yes, they are vintage. They are from year 1969 to 1972 ๐
Positional variance looks good, +8 seconds per day average. Amplitude (how far balance wheel moves) looks a bit low, but I'm not familiar with older watches, & may be normal, as is the 51ยฐ lift angle ๐๐ป
At least that's how I'd interpret it. ๐ค
It means your vintage watch is running fine.
Enjoy it.
Means itโs working
They are fully serviced, disassembled, checked all parts, new oil applied, reassembled and replaced the spring that pushes on the pinion where the second hand is because the second hand was jumping like 2.5hz ๐
I know modern watches, you're looking for a high amplitude, but for a vintage watch like this one, this amplitude is probably fine. Especially since it was just serviced! The accuracy looks just fine, and it's a really nice looking watch.