Comparing Casios.
I thought I'd share for anyone interested, my image showing the size difference between a Casio G-Shock GBD-200 and a Casio W-800. Both have negative display and show that the G-Shock has far superior legibility.
7 comments
Sort by
KezG
Seiko and Citizen fan with a modest, budget collection.
United Kingdom
Member since
Last active: 1 week ago
I think the G-Shock may have finer glass or "crystal" but it look strange with the second on next row...
I think the G-Shock may have finer glass or "crystal" but it look strange with the second on next row...
I guess it makes more space for the hours and minutes on screen.
Casio has really improved their negative displays. They used to be pretty bad, even on the Gs. Nice shot.
Casio has really improved their negative displays. They used to be pretty bad, even on the Gs. Nice shot.
Thank you.. I love the new MIP displays.. not much of a fan of the fitness tracking but others would like it. Battery life isn't marvellous for a Casio either but way better than full-on smart watches. Thankful that the battery used is readily available and inexpensive.
Didn't realise how big the W-800 was?!
Didn't realise how big the W-800 was?!
Yeah, I like them.. not as small as the f91.. The W-800 is like a mini G-Shock. I have modded mine by swapping the original strap for a chunkier strap from a Casio AE1100W.
I never liked the negative display, until I saw this GShock. Both are handsome as hell.