What do you think about this piece?

Reply
·

They post on here… but they don’t really engage when you ask them things.

·

Too much verbiage below - and the marker at 12 (or the lack of an applied one) is just odd.

·

It looks upside down to me. Remove the name and all the literature below it and it is a nice looking watch, albeit slightly homage-ish.

·
AllTheWatches

It looks upside down to me. Remove the name and all the literature below it and it is a nice looking watch, albeit slightly homage-ish.

I always find the “by …” quite funny when it’s clear they are very much “inspired” by other things.

The best one is the 1964 Horizon pictured, actually. The brand actually posted on here with:

The 1964 Horizon bears references to the history of Japanese design, with simplicity and functionality as its main factors.

yet it’s clearly an Explorer style case with a Submariner dial.

We always want to hear what's on your mind

Yeah… you really don’t.

We hear at Casio wished to celebrate the beautiful heritage of Swiss watchmaking like the Patek Philippe Calatrava. Our new G-Shock Mudman contains all of the elements that luxury Swiss watchmaking is known for…

·

If you like this kind of thing, Tudor have the BB36. For me, and no, I cannot justify why I think this, spot markers on a small watch look weird. They don't work for me on the BB36 and they don't work here. Combine that with the excessive text at 6 and missing 12 index and that's a lot of trouble. Crown grip looks aggressive and practical - I'll give them that.