I agree with you. Depending on the dial, I take photo around 10:08:38 position.
That's another popular one, as is 10:08.33. My (implicit) point was actually more the ubiquity of that time in watch listings, even wrist-shots. I suspect quite a few of these thank their existance to the likes of photoshop.
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
It's the perfect hand placement where text and subdials aren't obstructed.
I agree with you. Depending on the dial, I take photo around 10:08:38 position.
I agree with you. Depending on the dial, I take photo around 10:08:38 position.
That's another popular one, as is 10:08.33. My (implicit) point was actually more the ubiquity of that time in watch listings, even wrist-shots. I suspect quite a few of these thank their existance to the likes of photoshop.