I don’t know anything about this watch. Looks like the brother of the 1963. I like he design language. The subtle red in the street and second hand are stricking.
Cool one! The red dial version is on my shopping list.
I also thought for a long time about the shade to choose, the color of the strap matches beautifully with the red dial. But I was afraid that the beautiful red star (which is three-dimensional to the point of being almost crunchy) would get lost in the background.
It is a watch with character and although my wrist is large it adapts well to the situation
I don’t know anything about this watch. Looks like the brother of the 1963. I like he design language. The subtle red in the street and second hand are stricking.
We use cookies (and other similar technologies) for many purposes, including to improve your experience on
our
site and measure analytics. Click "Accept all" to accept these uses. Read more in our Cookie Policy.
This account is verified. WatchCrunch has confirmed that this account is the
authentic presence for this person or brand.
Cool one! The red dial version is on my shopping list.
I don’t know anything about this watch. Looks like the brother of the 1963. I like he design language. The subtle red in the street and second hand are stricking.
Cool one! The red dial version is on my shopping list.
I also thought for a long time about the shade to choose, the color of the strap matches beautifully with the red dial. But I was afraid that the beautiful red star (which is three-dimensional to the point of being almost crunchy) would get lost in the background.
It is a watch with character and although my wrist is large it adapts well to the situation
I don’t know anything about this watch. Looks like the brother of the 1963. I like he design language. The subtle red in the street and second hand are stricking.
I think exactly the same way