What is a popular brand/watch/category/feature you dislike ILLOGICALLY?

Let's try to keep this civil & respectful by just naming the brand/watch/category/feature and not the reasons. 

Mine: Huge logos & illegible skeletons

Reply
·

Gmt bezels on watches without a gmt hand. And ghost date positions

·

I have rationalized most of my biases, but my disdain for chronographs would probably have the least argument behind it. There's no real rationale behind my aversion to ana-digi watches either, I guess.

·

Date/month complication 😏 I’m too lazy to set the dates I just want the time sometimes hence I love my Tudor BB no date haha! The only watch I have that only tells time and that’s it! Oops I forgot about the Cartier hahaha 

·

Not sure if these should be included, but smart watches/fit bits. It is illogical given my love for Multiband 6 and all the complications of G Shock and Pro Trek, but I just don't like them.

·

I dislike "fussy" dials, like featured in Seiko/GS. 

I also dislike GMTs, and chronographs. 

·

Who the fck needs a helium escape valve. I mean. Come on. 

·

You hit the nail on the head with "illogically."  I mean, why the f*ck should I dislike any feature or brand???  Makes no sense whatsoever.

But, something @hbein2022 said in another post really resonates with me:

I used to live in Walnut Creek where people will pay the valet extra to have their Ferraris parked right in front of the restaurant. That is a different category: You are spending money in order to show other people you have money. 

That sort of a$$hattery is just ridiculous to my mind.  And, somehow, in my ignorant imagination, I see brands such as Hublot, Richard Mille, PP/AP/VC integrated-bracelet sports watches, and any watch worn by any famous / rich athlete, musician, reality TV star, and actor/actress as the embodiment of that sort of a$$hattery.

Thus, my illogical dislike of those brands and watches!

·

Hard back cases! For me, if the watch is not a diver, then it should be with a sapphire back 100%

·

ugly screw all over the face and hands that blend into dial clutter

·
R16013

Who the fck needs a helium escape valve. I mean. Come on. 

What, you don't like to spend time in a decompression chamber? (At least it's useful in theory.)

·
LumegaudAnar

Not sure if these should be included, but smart watches/fit bits. It is illogical given my love for Multiband 6 and all the complications of G Shock and Pro Trek, but I just don't like them.

they have their place for me, but not as a main watch. 

·

Most of these complaints or distastes are LOGICAL.  Ghost dates? Why? Fussy dials? Of course. A helium escape valve for a watch that you take off to wash dishes? Ugh. Unreadable skeletons (but, I repeat myself)? Double ugh.

I don't like street names where the persons' whole name is used. It doesn't matter who that person may be. I will take the Francis Parkway over the Norman C. Francis Parkway every day (formerly the Jefferson Davis Memorial Parkway).

So, no Christopher Ward or Raymond Weil for me.

·

For me I really dislike jewels on watches. Whenever I’ve seen it it just looks gaudy. 

·
Mr.Dee.Bater

You hit the nail on the head with "illogically."  I mean, why the f*ck should I dislike any feature or brand???  Makes no sense whatsoever.

But, something @hbein2022 said in another post really resonates with me:

I used to live in Walnut Creek where people will pay the valet extra to have their Ferraris parked right in front of the restaurant. That is a different category: You are spending money in order to show other people you have money. 

That sort of a$$hattery is just ridiculous to my mind.  And, somehow, in my ignorant imagination, I see brands such as Hublot, Richard Mille, PP/AP/VC integrated-bracelet sports watches, and any watch worn by any famous / rich athlete, musician, reality TV star, and actor/actress as the embodiment of that sort of a$$hattery.

Thus, my illogical dislike of those brands and watches!

This is a tricky question. If you try to take the Bling-Factor out of it: Hublot and Richard Mille have at least designs that are not boring. I have at least give them credit for pushing the envelope.

Could I personally get over it? Probably not, it's like how Justin Bieber ruined the Ballon Bleu for me. You cannot "unsee" certain things.

·
R16013

Who the fck needs a helium escape valve. I mean. Come on. 

"I know, I agree, it's pointless" I say while wearing my Deep Blue Defender with the helium escape valve. 🤣

·
hbein2022

This is a tricky question. If you try to take the Bling-Factor out of it: Hublot and Richard Mille have at least designs that are not boring. I have at least give them credit for pushing the envelope.

Could I personally get over it? Probably not, it's like how Justin Bieber ruined the Ballon Bleu for me. You cannot "unsee" certain things.

Justin Bieber!!!

Was playing poker with my buddies from high school - we been at it for 3 decades now.  Years ago, story about Justin Bieber came up, in which a woman from San Diego had accused him of being her baby daddy.  He was like 16 at the time and she said that they went into a bathroom stall for ~30 seconds.  

Buddies:  No way!  He's not the father.  He's like a good born-again Christian boy.  And his parents chaperone him everywhere

Me:  Guys, you're telling me that at age 16, no matter how "good" of a boy you are, you wouldn't have leapt at that opportunity???   

A few weeks later, Justin Bieber goes on Letterman to talk about how the woman was clearly a gold-digger, trying to extort money out of him, etc., etc.  Victory lap for the Beebs!

Buddies:  See?  He's exonerated

Me:  Uh, guys, his lawyers negotiated a PRIVATE paternity test, to which the woman agreed.  Then, after the test, the results of which remain PRIVATE, Justin Bieber announced that he's not the father,  and has gone out on a PR tour to all the late night talk shows.  Now...  if the woman's suit were frivolous, why wouldn't Justin Bieber's lawyers have conducted a PUBLIC paternity test, to signal to everyone that Justin is clearly not the father, and then show the results far and wide, and then SUE THE HELL OUT OF THAT WOMAN FOR MAKING FALSE CLAIMS?  Think about it:  If this were a frivolous claim, and they fear that lots of women are going after his money by making these sorts of claims, they could very easily shut this whole thing down by saddling a false accuser with millions of dollars of damages due to defamation.  Instead, they negotiated everything in private, have kept the results of the test private, and they've privately "settled" the suit with the woman

So, agreed.  No Ballon Bleu for me either.

·
Mr.Dee.Bater

Justin Bieber!!!

Was playing poker with my buddies from high school - we been at it for 3 decades now.  Years ago, story about Justin Bieber came up, in which a woman from San Diego had accused him of being her baby daddy.  He was like 16 at the time and she said that they went into a bathroom stall for ~30 seconds.  

Buddies:  No way!  He's not the father.  He's like a good born-again Christian boy.  And his parents chaperone him everywhere

Me:  Guys, you're telling me that at age 16, no matter how "good" of a boy you are, you wouldn't have leapt at that opportunity???   

A few weeks later, Justin Bieber goes on Letterman to talk about how the woman was clearly a gold-digger, trying to extort money out of him, etc., etc.  Victory lap for the Beebs!

Buddies:  See?  He's exonerated

Me:  Uh, guys, his lawyers negotiated a PRIVATE paternity test, to which the woman agreed.  Then, after the test, the results of which remain PRIVATE, Justin Bieber announced that he's not the father,  and has gone out on a PR tour to all the late night talk shows.  Now...  if the woman's suit were frivolous, why wouldn't Justin Bieber's lawyers have conducted a PUBLIC paternity test, to signal to everyone that Justin is clearly not the father, and then show the results far and wide, and then SUE THE HELL OUT OF THAT WOMAN FOR MAKING FALSE CLAIMS?  Think about it:  If this were a frivolous claim, and they fear that lots of women are going after his money by making these sorts of claims, they could very easily shut this whole thing down by saddling a false accuser with millions of dollars of damages due to defamation.  Instead, they negotiated everything in private, have kept the results of the test private, and they've privately "settled" the suit with the woman

So, agreed.  No Ballon Bleu for me either.

... especially not a pre-owned Ballon Bleu.

·

I hate overpriced homages. 

·

I hate:

  • Skeleton watches
  • Watches with some guy’s full name on the dial: Dan Henry, Christopher Ward, etc. I’m not wearing Calvin Klein’s underpants either
  • People that bought Rolex’ marketing and have made the insane quantity of vintage-to-modern Submariners unattainable for a minimum wage knob like me - Ugh! I’ll get over it eventually lol 😂 
  • Seiko for discontinuing the SKX007 and putting out those awful Seiko 5 non-divers in its case, instead of upgrading the 007 to a new movement and making it part of the ProSpex line. And for making their re-issue divers so expensive that they are out of reach for most fans. - Ugh II Electric Boogaloo
  • Tudor for not releasing an almost affordable, almost attainable, 40mm, modern, snowflake Submariner with ‘Submariner’ on the dial - yes I know Rolex would never allow it, now! 
  • And Rolex again for not letting Tudor make Submariners!!! 🤣

Well that was great, I’m having a good giggle at myself, now. 😂

·

I'm also adding the hour hands on Tudor Black Bay's