Today a 1967 Seiko Sportsman 6602-9981/2.๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜‰

Rare Lume Model. Lume still works (just) after 56 years ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜‰๐Ÿ˜ƒ

ยท

Always amazing these Sportsmatic and Sportsman are... Image

ยท

Thanks Hakki.๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜‰๐Ÿ˜ƒ

ยท

Wow that's completely amazing ๐Ÿคฉ

ยท

Lovely #lume and A Seiko 5 Stunning piece ๐Ÿ˜

ยท

Such a good looking thing! Great strap choice too

ยท
Mil_Watch_Nut

Such a good looking thing! Great strap choice too

Thanks James.๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜‰๐Ÿ˜ƒ

ยท
SunnyCrackit

Lovely #lume and A Seiko 5 Stunning piece ๐Ÿ˜

Thanks Glen๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜‰๐Ÿ˜ƒ

ยท

Thanks for showing. It looks almost new from here. But you can tell it's old from the logo obviously, but also because it says "Waterproof". I think they should bring back that designation, and apply it to any watch that can be submerged without letting water leak in, instead of the confusing and nebulous "Water Resistance" system we have now. I'm guessing all most people care about is if the watch can be submerged in water without being damaged, and not so much about depth.

ยท
samdeatton

Thanks for showing. It looks almost new from here. But you can tell it's old from the logo obviously, but also because it says "Waterproof". I think they should bring back that designation, and apply it to any watch that can be submerged without letting water leak in, instead of the confusing and nebulous "Water Resistance" system we have now. I'm guessing all most people care about is if the watch can be submerged in water without being damaged, and not so much about depth.

Thanks Tom๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜‰